手法を比較

	Web Controversy Analysis	Controversy Mapping
分野	Science Technology Studies	Science Technology Studies
系統	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
提唱年	2012	2010
提唱者	Tommaso Venturini, Noortje Marres	Bruno Latour (Sciences Po médialab); codified by Tommaso Venturini
種類	Web-native controversy research method	Qualitative descriptive method and pedagogy
原典	Venturini, T. (2012). Building on faults: how to represent controversies with digital methods. Public Understanding of Science, 21(7), 796-812.	Venturini, T. (2010). Diving in magma: how to explore controversies with actor-network theory. Public Understanding of Science, 19(3), 258-273.
別名	Web controversy mapping, Hyperlink controversy analysis, Online controversy cartography	Cartography of controversies, Mapping scientific controversies, Controversy analysis
関連	4	4
概要	Web controversy analysis studies scientific, technical, and public controversies through the traces they leave online—hyperlink networks, search-engine results, and social-media activity. Building on the controversy-mapping tradition but reworking it as a web-native digital method, it follows Tommaso Venturini's call to 'build on faults' and Noortje Marres's argument for controversy analysis as a digital method, using crawling and co-link analysis to reveal how positions in a dispute are connected, opposed, and arranged across the web.	Controversy mapping is a descriptive method for exploring and representing socio-technical disputes while they are still open and unsettled, before they harden into accepted facts or stable technologies. Developed as a teaching practice by Bruno Latour and codified by Tommaso Venturini at the Sciences Po médialab, it asks the analyst to dive into the heat of a debate, follow the actors and their arguments without prematurely taking sides, and render the resulting complexity legible through maps and visualisations. It treats controversy not as a pathology to be resolved but as the privileged moment in which the social and the technical are visibly being assembled.