Conjoint Survey Experiment
A conjoint survey experiment presents respondents with profiles — of candidates, immigrants, policies, or products — described by several attributes whose levels are independently randomized, and asks respondents to choose between or rate the profiles. Hainmueller, Hopkins, and Yamamoto's 2014 framework places this design on a rigorous causal footing, defining the average marginal component effect (AMCE) as the design-based causal effect of an attribute level, averaged over the randomization distribution of all other attributes. It lets political scientists estimate the relative causal weight of many decision factors simultaneously from realistic, multidimensional choices.
手法の全文を読む
無料アカウントでログインすると、このセクションを読めます。
手法マップ
関連する手法の近傍 — ノードを選択して探索できます。
出典
- Hainmueller, J., Hopkins, D. J., & Yamamoto, T. (2014). Causal Inference in Conjoint Analysis: Understanding Multidimensional Choices via Stated Preference Experiments. Political Analysis, 22(1), 1–30. DOI: 10.1093/pan/mpt024 ↗
- Hainmueller, J., Hangartner, D., & Yamamoto, T. (2015). Validating Vignette and Conjoint Survey Experiments against Real-World Behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(8), 2395–2400. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1416587112 ↗
- Leeper, T. J., Hobolt, S. B., & Tilley, J. (2020). Measuring Subgroup Preferences in Conjoint Experiments. Political Analysis, 28(2), 207–221. DOI: 10.1017/pan.2019.30 ↗
このページの引用方法
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Conjoint Survey Experiment (Causal Conjoint Analysis). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ja/political-science/conjoint-survey-experiment
どの手法を選ぶ？
この手法を最も近い類縁の手法と並べ、両者を見比べてください — ライブラリは本を机の上に並べるだけ。選ぶのはあなたです。
- コンジョイント分析実験計画法↔ 比較
- Factorial Survey ExperimentPolitical Science↔ 比較
- Survey ExperimentPolitical Science↔ 比較
- Vignette ExperimentPolitical Science↔ 比較