Latent-Class Choice Segmentation
Latent-class choice segmentation estimates consumer market segments and their preferences at the same time, by fitting a finite mixture of discrete-choice models to individual purchase or choice data. Wagner Kamakura and Gary Russell introduced the approach in their 1989 Journal of Marketing Research paper, which fit a probabilistic choice model whose latent segments differ in both brand preference and price sensitivity, yielding a unified picture of market structure and elasticities. Rather than clustering consumers first and modeling choice afterward, the method treats segment membership as an unobserved (latent) variable and recovers it jointly with the segment-level choice parameters by maximum likelihood. Each segment is a multinomial logit model with its own coefficient vector, and the mixing proportions describe how large each segment is. Michel Wedel and Wagner Kamakura's authoritative monograph later codified the finite-mixture framework as the methodological backbone of model-based market segmentation. The result links the pattern of brand switching to the magnitudes of own- and cross-price elasticities, giving managers a behaviorally grounded segmentation tied directly to demand response.
手法の全文を読む
無料アカウントでログインすると、このセクションを読めます。
手法マップ
関連する手法の近傍 — ノードを選択して探索できます。
出典
- Kamakura, W. A., & Russell, G. J. (1989). A Probabilistic Choice Model for Market Segmentation and Elasticity Structure. Journal of Marketing Research, 26(4), 379-390. DOI: 10.1177/002224378902600401 ↗
- Wedel, M., & Kamakura, W. A. (2000). Market Segmentation: Conceptual and Methodological Foundations (2nd ed.). Springer (Kluwer Academic). ISBN: 9781461371045
このページの引用方法
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Latent-Class Choice Segmentation (Finite-Mixture Multinomial Logit Models). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ja/marketing-science/latent-class-choice-segmentation
どの手法を選ぶ?
この手法を最も近い類縁の手法と並べ、両者を見比べてください — ライブラリは本を机の上に並べるだけ。選ぶのはあなたです。
- Hierarchical Bayes Choice Modelマーケティング↔ 比較
- Perceptual MappingMarketing Science↔ 比較
- TURF AnalysisMarketing Science↔ 比較