ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

アクションリサーチ×教室観察×カリキュラム分析×デザインベース研究×
分野質的研究フィールド調査法フィールド調査法フィールド調査法
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipelineProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年19461960s (Flanders Interaction Analysis); refined through 1990s–2000s1949 (Tyler); 1980s–2000s (Posner's analytic framework)1992
提唱者Kurt Lewin; expanded by Kemmis, McTaggart, Reason & BradburyNed Flanders (systematic interaction analysis); Robert Pianta et al. (CLASS system)George J. Posner (systematic framework); Ralph Tyler (foundational rationale)Ann L. Brown and Allan Collins (independently, 1992)
種類MethodQualitative and quantitative observational researchQualitative / mixed document analysisInterventionist qualitative-quantitative mixed methodology
原典Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34–46. DOI ↗Flanders, N. A. (1970). Analyzing Teaching Behavior. Addison-Wesley. link ↗Posner, G. J. (2004). Analyzing the Curriculum (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill. ISBN: 978-0072823899Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141–178. DOI ↗
別名Participatory Action Research, PAR, Collaborative Inquiryclassroom observation research, structured classroom observation, instructional observation, lesson observationcurriculum evaluation, curriculum review, syllabus analysis, curriculum appraisalDBR, design research, design experiment, educational design research
関連1666
概要Action research is a collaborative research methodology in which researchers work with practitioners and community members to investigate a problem, implement change, and evaluate outcomes, cycling through reflection, action, and learning. Developed by Kurt Lewin (1946), action research bridges research and practice, aiming simultaneously to produce knowledge and practical improvement.Classroom observation is a field research method in which a trained observer systematically watches, documents, and analyzes teaching and learning events as they occur in a real classroom setting. It can be structured (using a predefined coding instrument such as Flanders Interaction Analysis or CLASS), semi-structured, or open-ended (ethnographic notes), and is used across educational research, teacher professional development, school evaluation, and curriculum studies to generate ecologically valid evidence about instructional practice.Curriculum analysis is a systematic research method for examining the content, structure, goals, and underlying assumptions of educational curricula — including written syllabi, textbooks, lesson plans, and policy documents. By mapping what is taught, how it is sequenced, and what values are embedded, researchers and educators can evaluate alignment with learning objectives, identify gaps or biases, and guide curriculum reform across all levels of education.Design-based research (DBR) is an iterative, interventionist methodology that simultaneously designs educational interventions and builds theory about how and why those interventions work in authentic, complex settings. Originating in Ann Brown's 1992 classroom experiments and Allan Collins's parallel work, DBR treats the learning environment as both the object of study and the site of theory generation, cycling through design, enactment, analysis, and redesign until both practical improvement and theoretical insight are achieved.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 3 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Action Research · Classroom Observation · Curriculum Analysis · Design-based Research. 2026-06-19に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare