ScholarGate
Assistente
Process / pipelineLand-use change simulation / growth management

Urban Growth Boundary Analysis

Urban growth boundary (UGB) analysis uses spatial simulation to design and evaluate containment lines that separate land where urban development is allowed from land to be kept rural. Built on the cellular-automata urban-growth tradition exemplified by Clarke, Hoppen, and Gaydos's self-modifying SLEUTH model, it calibrates how a region urbanizes, then imposes candidate boundaries as hard or soft constraints and simulates land conversion forward in time. By comparing scenarios with and without a boundary, the method estimates how much farmland and open space a UGB would protect, how much it would densify the interior, and whether it would push leapfrog development beyond the line.

Apri in MethodMindIn arrivoApplica, confronta, ottieni indicazioni
Strumenti e risorse
Scarica le diapositive
Impara ed esplora
VideoIn arrivo

Leggi il metodo completo

Riservato ai membri

Accedi con un account gratuito per leggere questa sezione.

Accedi

Mappa dei metodi

Il vicinato dei metodi correlati — seleziona un nodo per esplorare.

Fonti

  1. Clarke, K. C., Hoppen, S., & Gaydos, L. (1997). A self-modifying cellular automaton model of historical urbanization in the San Francisco Bay area. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 24(2), 247–261. DOI: 10.1068/b240247

Come citare questa pagina

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Urban Growth Boundary Analysis (Scenario Simulation of Containment and Land Conversion). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/it/urban-studies/urban-growth-boundary-analysis

Quale metodo?

Affianca questo metodo ai suoi parenti più prossimi e leggili fianco a fianco — la biblioteca dispone i libri sul tavolo; la scelta è tua.

Confronta affiancati

Citato da

ScholarGateUrban Growth Boundary Analysis (Urban Growth Boundary Analysis (Scenario Simulation of Containment and Land Conversion)). Consultato il 2026-06-24 da https://scholargate.app/it/urban-studies/urban-growth-boundary-analysis · Insieme di dati: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026