ScholarGate
Assistente
Process / pipelinePublic bureaucracy and delegation studies

Principal-Agent Analysis in the Public Sector

Principal-agent analysis in the public sector applies agency theory to the chains of delegation that run through government — from voters to legislators, legislators to executives, and executives to bureaucracies. Terry Moe's 1984 article The New Economics of Organization brought this institutional-economics lens into the study of public bureaucracy, asking how political principals can control agents who have their own interests and superior information. The method identifies the principal and agent, specifies how their goals diverge, characterises the information asymmetry between them, and examines the control mechanisms principals use to limit agency losses. Its purpose is to explain bureaucratic behaviour and the design of oversight as the predictable result of delegation under conflicting incentives.

Apri in MethodMindIn arrivoApplica, confronta, ottieni indicazioni
Strumenti e risorse
Scarica le diapositive
Impara ed esplora
VideoIn arrivo

Leggi il metodo completo

Riservato ai membri

Accedi con un account gratuito per leggere questa sezione.

Accedi

Mappa dei metodi

Il vicinato dei metodi correlati — seleziona un nodo per esplorare.

Fonti

  1. Moe, T. M. (1984). The New Economics of Organization. American Journal of Political Science, 28(4), 739–777. DOI: 10.2307/2110997

Come citare questa pagina

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Principal-Agent Analysis of Public-Sector Delegation. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/it/public-administration/principal-agent-analysis-public

Quale metodo?

Affianca questo metodo ai suoi parenti più prossimi e leggili fianco a fianco — la biblioteca dispone i libri sul tavolo; la scelta è tua.

Confronta affiancati

Citato da

ScholarGatePrincipal-Agent Analysis in the Public Sector (Principal-Agent Analysis of Public-Sector Delegation). Consultato il 2026-06-24 da https://scholargate.app/it/public-administration/principal-agent-analysis-public · Insieme di dati: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026