ScholarGate
Asisten
Process / pipelineBiblical exegesis / Gospel composition

Redaction Criticism

Redaction criticism (Redaktionsgeschichte) studies the biblical authors not as passive collectors of tradition but as genuine authors and theologians who shaped their inherited material to make a point. Where form criticism dissolved the Gospels into independent oral units, redaction criticism puts the spotlight back on the evangelist who selected, arranged, and edited those units. By comparing the final text with the sources and traditions behind it, the critic isolates the changes the author made, looks for a consistent pattern in those changes, and reads off the theological program that motivated them. Hans Conzelmann's 1953 study of Luke is the classic example, and Norman Perrin's 1969 primer What Is Redaction Criticism? introduced the method to English readers and articulated its logic.

Buka di MethodMindSegeraTerapkan, bandingkan, dapatkan panduan
Alat & sumber daya
Unduh salindia
Belajar & jelajahi
VideoSegera

Baca metode selengkapnya

Khusus anggota

Masuk dengan akun gratis untuk membaca bagian ini.

Masuk

Peta metode

Lingkup metode terkait — pilih sebuah simpul untuk menjelajah.

Sumber

  1. Perrin, N. (1969). What Is Redaction Criticism? Philadelphia: Fortress Press. ISBN: 9780800601812
  2. Conzelmann, H. (1960). The Theology of St Luke (trans. G. Buswell). New York: Harper. [German 'Die Mitte der Zeit', 1953]. link

Cara menyitasi halaman ini

ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Redaction Criticism (Redaktionsgeschichte: Editorial Theology of the Final Author). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/id/religious-studies/redaction-criticism

Metode yang mana?

Letakkan metode ini berdampingan dengan kerabat terdekatnya dan baca secara bersisian — pustaka menata bukunya di atas meja; pilihan ada di tangan Anda.

Bandingkan berdampingan

Dirujuk oleh

ScholarGateRedaction Criticism (Redaction Criticism (Redaktionsgeschichte: Editorial Theology of the Final Author)). Diakses 2026-06-24 dari https://scholargate.app/id/religious-studies/redaction-criticism · Set data: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026