Collaborative Governance Assessment
Collaborative governance assessment is a framework for analysing arrangements in which public agencies and non-state stakeholders deliberate together to make or implement public policy by consensus. Synthesised by Chris Ansell and Alison Gash in their 2008 article from a meta-analysis of over a hundred cases, it identifies the starting conditions, institutional design and facilitative leadership that feed into an iterative collaborative process and ultimately shape outcomes. The framework treats collaboration not as a single event but as a cycle of face-to-face dialogue, trust-building, shared understanding and intermediate commitments. Its purpose is to explain why some multi-stakeholder partnerships succeed while others stall or collapse.
Baca metode selengkapnya
Masuk dengan akun gratis untuk membaca bagian ini.
Peta metode
Lingkup metode terkait — pilih sebuah simpul untuk menjelajah.
Sumber
- Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. DOI: 10.1093/jopart/mum032 ↗
Cara menyitasi halaman ini
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Collaborative Governance Assessment Framework. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/id/public-administration/collaborative-governance-assessment
Metode yang mana?
Letakkan metode ini berdampingan dengan kerabat terdekatnya dan baca secara bersisian — pustaka menata bukunya di atas meja; pilihan ada di tangan Anda.
- Accountability Mechanism AnalysisPublic Administration↔ bandingkan
- Co-Production AssessmentPublic Administration↔ bandingkan
- Policy Implementation AnalysisPublic Administration↔ bandingkan
- Realist EvaluationPublic Policy↔ bandingkan
Dirujuk oleh
Metode serupa
Menemukan masalah di halaman ini? Laporkan atau usulkan perbaikan →