ScholarGate
Asisten
Regression modelValue-added and accountability models

Value-Added Teacher Evaluation

Value-added teacher evaluation uses longitudinal student test scores to estimate how much individual teachers contribute to their students' achievement growth, net of what students brought into the classroom. Statistically it applies value-added and mixed-model machinery — controlling for prior achievement and student characteristics, then treating each teacher's residual contribution as an effect to be estimated. Pioneered in Tennessee's TVAAS and scrutinized in a large methodological and policy literature, it became central, and controversial, in teacher accountability.

Buka di MethodMindSegeraTerapkan, bandingkan, dapatkan panduan
Alat & sumber daya
Unduh salindia
Belajar & jelajahi
VideoSegera

Baca metode selengkapnya

Khusus anggota

Masuk dengan akun gratis untuk membaca bagian ini.

Masuk

Peta metode

Lingkup metode terkait — pilih sebuah simpul untuk menjelajah.

Sumber

  1. McCaffrey, D. F., Lockwood, J. R., Koretz, D., Louis, T. A., & Hamilton, L. (2004). Models for value-added modeling of teacher effects. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29(1), 67–101. DOI: 10.3102/10769986029001067
  2. Sanders, W. L., & Horn, S. P. (1994). The Tennessee Value-Added Assessment System (TVAAS): Mixed-model methodology in educational assessment. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 8(3), 299–311. DOI: 10.1007/BF00973726

Cara menyitasi halaman ini

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Value-Added Models for Estimating Teacher Effects. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/id/education/value-added-teacher-evaluation

Metode yang mana?

Letakkan metode ini berdampingan dengan kerabat terdekatnya dan baca secara bersisian — pustaka menata bukunya di atas meja; pilihan ada di tangan Anda.

Bandingkan berdampingan

Dirujuk oleh

ScholarGateValue-Added Teacher Evaluation (Value-Added Models for Estimating Teacher Effects). Diakses 2026-06-24 dari https://scholargate.app/id/education/value-added-teacher-evaluation · Set data: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026