Collaborative Governance Assessment
Collaborative governance assessment is a framework for analysing arrangements in which public agencies and non-state stakeholders deliberate together to make or implement public policy by consensus. Synthesised by Chris Ansell and Alison Gash in their 2008 article from a meta-analysis of over a hundred cases, it identifies the starting conditions, institutional design and facilitative leadership that feed into an iterative collaborative process and ultimately shape outcomes. The framework treats collaboration not as a single event but as a cycle of face-to-face dialogue, trust-building, shared understanding and intermediate commitments. Its purpose is to explain why some multi-stakeholder partnerships succeed while others stall or collapse.
Lire la méthode complète
Connectez-vous avec un compte gratuit pour lire cette section.
Carte des méthodes
Le voisinage des méthodes apparentées — sélectionnez un nœud pour explorer.
Sources
- Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. DOI: 10.1093/jopart/mum032 ↗
Comment citer cette page
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Collaborative Governance Assessment Framework. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/fr/public-administration/collaborative-governance-assessment
Quelle méthode ?
Placez cette méthode aux côtés de ses plus proches parentes et lisez-les côte à côte — la bibliothèque pose les ouvrages sur la table ; le choix vous revient.
- Accountability Mechanism AnalysisPublic Administration↔ comparer
- Co-Production AssessmentPublic Administration↔ comparer
- Policy Implementation AnalysisPublic Administration↔ comparer
- Realist EvaluationPublic Policy↔ comparer
Référencée par
Méthodes similaires
Une erreur sur cette page ? Signalez-la ou proposez une correction →