Democratic Norms Support Measurement
This approach measures how committed ordinary citizens are to democratic norms by observing the price they are willing to pay to uphold them. Rather than asking abstractly whether people value democracy, Matthew Graham and Milan Svolik's 2020 candidate-choice design confronts voters with a co-partisan candidate who violates a democratic principle and estimates how much electoral support that violation costs. Their finding that most Americans will tolerate undemocratic behavior by their own side when partisanship and policy stakes are high reframed the study of democratic backsliding around revealed, not professed, commitment. Christopher Claassen's parallel work links aggregate diffuse support for democracy to whether democracies survive.
Lire la méthode complète
Connectez-vous avec un compte gratuit pour lire cette section.
Carte des méthodes
Le voisinage des méthodes apparentées — sélectionnez un nœud pour explorer.
Sources
- Graham, M. H., & Svolik, M. W. (2020). Democracy in America? Partisanship, Polarization, and the Robustness of Support for Democracy in the United States. American Political Science Review, 114(2), 392-409. DOI: 10.1017/S0003055420000052 ↗
- Claassen, C. (2020). Does Public Support Help Democracy Survive? American Journal of Political Science, 64(1), 118-134. DOI: 10.1111/ajps.12452 ↗
Comment citer cette page
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Measuring Mass Support for Democratic Norms (Candidate-Choice Tradeoff Design). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/fr/political-psychology/democratic-norms-support-scale
Quelle méthode ?
Placez cette méthode aux côtés de ses plus proches parentes et lisez-les côte à côte — la bibliothèque pose les ouvrages sur la table ; le choix vous revient.
- Elite Cue ExperimentPsychologie politique↔ comparer
- Échelle de confiance politiquePsychologie politique↔ comparer
- Support for Political Violence MeasurePsychologie politique↔ comparer
Référencée par
Méthodes similaires
Une erreur sur cette page ? Signalez-la ou proposez une correction →