ScholarGate
Assistant
Process / pipelineService-quality measurement / survey methodology

LibQUAL Service Quality Assessment

LibQUAL+ is a standardized survey method for measuring library service quality from the user's point of view, built on the gap-analysis logic of the SERVQUAL instrument from marketing. For each survey item, users supply three ratings, the minimum service they would find acceptable, the service they desire, and the service they actually perceive, and the method computes gap scores from these: an adequacy gap (perceived minus minimum) and a superiority gap (perceived minus desired). The space between minimum and desired defines a zone of tolerance, and the analysis reveals which services fall below it, sit within it, or exceed it. Developed by Colleen Cook, Fred Heath, and Bruce Thompson under the Association of Research Libraries and validated across hundreds of institutions, LibQUAL+ organizes items into dimensions such as Affect of Service, Information Control, and Library as Place.

Ouvrir dans MethodMindBientôtAppliquer, comparer, obtenir des conseils
Outils et ressources
Télécharger les diapositives
Apprendre et explorer
VidéoBientôt

Lire la méthode complète

Réservé aux membres

Connectez-vous avec un compte gratuit pour lire cette section.

Se connecter

Carte des méthodes

Le voisinage des méthodes apparentées — sélectionnez un nœud pour explorer.

Sources

  1. Cook, C., Heath, F., & Thompson, B. (2001). Users' Hierarchical Perspectives on Library Service Quality: A 'LibQUAL+' Study. College & Research Libraries, 62(2), 147-153. DOI: 10.5860/crl.62.2.147
  2. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A Multiple-Item Scale for Measuring Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12-40. link

Comment citer cette page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). LibQUAL+ Service Quality Assessment (Gap-Based Library Service Quality Measurement). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/fr/library-information-science/libqual-service-quality-assessment

Quelle méthode ?

Placez cette méthode aux côtés de ses plus proches parentes et lisez-les côte à côte — la bibliothèque pose les ouvrages sur la table ; le choix vous revient.

Comparer côte à côte

Référencée par

ScholarGateLibQUAL Service Quality Assessment (LibQUAL+ Service Quality Assessment (Gap-Based Library Service Quality Measurement)). Consulté le 2026-06-24 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/library-information-science/libqual-service-quality-assessment · Jeu de données : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026