Boundary-Work Analysis
Boundary-work analysis studies how the line between science and non-science is drawn, defended, and contested—not by philosophers laying down timeless criteria, but by actors doing rhetorical work to secure authority, resources, and credibility. Introduced by Thomas Gieryn in 1983 and elaborated in his 1999 book Cultural Boundaries of Science, the approach treats demarcation as a practical, strategic, and historically variable accomplishment. The method examines the discourse of demarcation episodes to reveal the strategies—expansion, expulsion, and protection of autonomy—through which the cultural map of science is redrawn whenever its credibility is on the line.
Leer el método completo
Inicia sesión con una cuenta gratuita para leer esta sección.
Mapa de métodos
El vecindario de métodos relacionados: selecciona un nodo para explorarlo.
Fuentes
- Gieryn, T. F. (1983). Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48(6), 781-795. DOI: 10.2307/2095325 ↗
- Gieryn, T. F. (1999). Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. University of Chicago Press. ISBN: 9780226292625
Cómo citar esta página
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Boundary-Work Analysis (Demarcation of Science). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/es/science-technology-studies/boundary-work-analysis
¿Qué método?
Coloca este método junto a sus parientes más cercanos y léelos lado a lado: la biblioteca pone los libros sobre la mesa; la elección es tuya.
- Controversy MappingScience Technology Studies↔ comparar
- Laboratory EthnographyScience Technology Studies↔ comparar
- Sociotechnical Imaginaries AnalysisScience Technology Studies↔ comparar
- Technological Frames AnalysisScience Technology Studies↔ comparar
Citado por
Métodos similares
¿Has visto un problema en esta página? Infórmanos o sugiere una corrección →