Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfallsApplicationsFrequently asked🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Social Psychology›Social Capital Scale
Process / pipelineSocial cognition

Social Capital Scale

Also known as: SCS

The Social Capital Scale is a self-report measure designed to assess the presence and extent of social capital in individuals and communities. Building on Robert D. Putnam's influential work on social capital as shared norms, networks, and reciprocity, the scale measures dimensions of social connection, participation in community life, and access to social resources. Multiple versions exist, including the scale developed by Onyx and Bullen (2000) with community-level validation.

ScholarGate
  1. Process / pipeline
  2. v1
  3. 2 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

Social Capital Scale
Collectivism-Individuali…Cultural Values ScaleInterpersonal Reactivity…Modern Racism Scale

When to use it

Use the Social Capital Scale in research on community health, civic engagement, neighborhood effects, and social well-being. Suitable for community-based research, organizational studies, and comparative investigations of social cohesion. The scale is valuable when examining relationships between social capital and mental health, health behaviors, crime rates, or educational outcomes.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Directly operationalizes Putnam's influential theory of social capital into measurable dimensions
  • Multiple validated versions available for different contexts (individuals, communities, organizations)
  • Items capture both bonding and bridging social capital (within-group and between-group ties)
  • Extensive research base demonstrating relationships with community health, well-being, and economic outcomes
Limitations
  • The concept of social capital is contested; different researchers emphasize different dimensions
  • May be subject to social desirability bias; respondents may overstate civic participation and trust
  • Items may emphasize Western concepts of community participation and civic engagement
  • Cross-sectional scores do not capture dynamic changes in social capital over time

Frequently asked

What is the difference between bonding and bridging social capital?

Bonding social capital refers to strong ties within groups (family, close friends, similar others), which reinforce group identity and provide emotional support. Bridging social capital refers to weaker ties across diverse groups, which provide information and access to broader opportunities. Both are valuable but serve different functions.

Can social capital be negative?

Yes. High social capital within a group can facilitate discrimination against outsiders, enforce conformity, or facilitate crime if norms are antisocial. Social capital is a neutral structural property; whether it produces positive or negative outcomes depends on the norms and goals of the networks involved.

How does the Social Capital Scale measure community-level capital versus individual variations?

Different versions emphasize different levels. Individual-level versions measure individual participation and trust. Community-level versions aggregate individual responses to characterize neighborhood social capital. Some instruments measure access to social networks and resources (individual) while others measure shared norms (community).

Can social capital be built intentionally?

Yes, though the process is complex and slow. Community centers, volunteer opportunities, civic organizations, and inclusive institutions can build bridging social capital. However, structural conditions like economic inequality and residential segregation make social capital building difficult.

Sources

  1. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster. link ↗
  2. Onyx, J., & Bullen, P. (2000). Measuring social capital in five communities. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 36(1), 23–42. DOI: 10.1177/0021886300361002 ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 3). Social Capital Scale. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/social-psychology/social-capital-scale

Related methods

Collectivism-Individualism ScaleCultural Values ScaleInterpersonal Reactivity IndexModern Racism Scale

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • Collectivism-Individualism ScaleSocial Psychology↔ compare
  • Cultural Values ScaleSocial Psychology↔ compare
  • Interpersonal Reactivity IndexSocial Psychology↔ compare
  • Modern Racism ScaleSocial Psychology↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Referenced by

Collectivism-Individualism ScaleInterpersonal Reactivity Index

Similar methods

Social Capital IndexSocial Cohesion ScaleGeneralized Trust ScaleCommunity Belonging ScaleCollective Efficacy ScaleCivic Engagement ScaleSense of Belonging ScalePolitical Cynicism Scale

Related reference concepts

Community Resilience and RecoverySelf Concept MeasuresPersonality Scales & InventoriesCommunity & Social ServicesPersonality MeasuresSocial Structure & Organization

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — Social Capital Scale (Social Capital Scale). Retrieved 2026-07-20 from https://scholargate.app/en/social-psychology/social-capital-scale · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
Robert D. Putnam, Jill Onyx, and Paul Bullen
Subfamily
Social cognition
Year
2000
Type
Self-report Likert scale
Related methods
Collectivism-Individualism ScaleCultural Values ScaleInterpersonal Reactivity IndexModern Racism Scale
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account