Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfallsApplicationsFrequently asked🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Political Sociology›Community Belonging Scale
Process / pipelineSense of Belonging

Community Belonging Scale

Sense of Community and Belonging Assessment · Also known as: CBS, Community Integration Scale

The Community Belonging Scale measures the subjective psychological sense of community—the feeling that one belongs, is accepted, and is valued within one's community. Distinct from objective measures of networks or participation, it captures the affective experience of community integration. Developed by Seymour Sarason and refined by McMillan and Chavis, it is grounded in community psychology and emphasizes that belonging is fundamental to mental health and social well-being.

ScholarGate
  1. Process / pipeline
  2. v1
  3. 3 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

Community Belonging Scale
Civic Engagement ScaleGeneralized Trust ScaleSocial Capital IndexSocial Cohesion ScaleIntergroup Contact Scale

When to use it

Community belonging is measured in mental health research, urban planning and neighborhood studies, immigrant integration research, youth community participation, school climate surveys, and post-disaster community recovery assessments. Valuable for evaluating whether community development initiatives increase resident sense of belonging and for understanding how community factors affect mental health disparities.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Captures affective (emotional) dimension of community that structural measures (networks, organizations) do not
  • Strong empirical associations with mental health, life satisfaction, and health behaviors—robust criterion validity
  • Sensitive to community-level changes and interventions; responsive to efforts to build welcoming communities
  • Applicable across diverse community types (urban, rural, online) with minor adaptations
  • Psychologically grounded in motivation and basic needs; directly interpretable as well-being indicator
Limitations
  • Self-report bias: individuals' sense of belonging may not reflect actual community acceptance; lonely individuals may perceive rejection even if community is inclusive
  • Selection effects: individuals who feel belonging tend to remain in community, while those with weak belonging move away, creating selection bias in cross-sectional samples
  • Cultural variation: conceptualization of 'community' and appropriate level of belonging differ across cultures (individualist vs. collectivist orientations)
  • Temporal instability: sense of belonging fluctuates with personal circumstances and life events independent of actual community change

Frequently asked

Is sense of belonging the same as having friends?

Related but distinct. Having friends is important for belonging, but belonging also requires feeling accepted by the broader community and identifying with shared values. Someone with best friends may not feel community belonging if they perceive the broader community as hostile or exclusive.

Can sense of community belonging be created, or is it deeply personal?

Both. Some belonging reflects individual personality and attachment style; however, community conditions strongly influence belonging. Welcoming institutions, diverse community events, public spaces, and inclusive norms measurably increase individuals' sense of belonging even when personal characteristics remain constant.

What is the relationship between belonging and mental health?

Research shows moderate-to-strong associations: strong community belonging predicts lower depression and anxiety, higher life satisfaction, and better coping with stress. Belonging buffers mental health effects of discrimination, economic hardship, and other stressors. The relationship is bidirectional: depression can reduce perception of belonging; weak belonging increases depression risk.

Is high community belonging universally positive?

Mostly yes, with caveats. High belonging in an inclusive community is reliably beneficial. However, high belonging in communities with antisocial or harmful norms (e.g., criminal networks, extremist groups) can facilitate harmful behavior. Context matters; belonging is protective when community norms support well-being.

Sources

  1. Sarason, S. B. (1974). The psychological sense of community: Prospects for a community psychology. Jossey-Bass. link ↗
  2. McMillan, D. W., & Chavis, D. M. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 14(1), 6-23. DOI: 10.1002/1520-6629(198601)14:1<6::AID-JCOP2290140103>3.0.CO;2-I ↗
  3. Chipuer, H. M., & Pretty, G. M. (1999). A review of the empirical literature examining the association between social capital and mental health. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 6(6), 451-458. link ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 3). Sense of Community and Belonging Assessment. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/political-sociology/community-belonging-scale

Related methods

Civic Engagement ScaleGeneralized Trust ScaleSocial Capital IndexSocial Cohesion Scale

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • Civic Engagement ScalePolitical Sociology↔ compare
  • Generalized Trust ScalePolitical Sociology↔ compare
  • Social Capital IndexPolitical Sociology↔ compare
  • Social Cohesion ScalePolitical Sociology↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Referenced by

Civic Engagement ScaleGeneralized Trust ScaleIntergroup Contact ScaleSocial Capital IndexSocial Cohesion Scale

Similar methods

Sense of Belonging ScaleSocial Cohesion ScaleNeed to Belong ScaleSocial Capital ScaleSocial Inclusion ScaleCNSMultigroup Ethnic Identity MeasureLockdown Wellbeing Scale

Related reference concepts

Community & Environmental PlanningCommunity & Social ServicesCommunity Mental Health ServicesCommunity Resilience and RecoveryCommunity Mental Health and RecoveryCultural Competency and Mental Health Disparities

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — Community Belonging Scale (Sense of Community and Belonging Assessment). Retrieved 2026-07-21 from https://scholargate.app/en/political-sociology/community-belonging-scale · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
Seymour Sarason, David McMillan, David Chavis
Subfamily
Sense of Belonging
Year
1974–1999
Type
Self-report questionnaire
Related methods
Civic Engagement ScaleGeneralized Trust ScaleSocial Capital IndexSocial Cohesion Scale
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account