Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfallsApplicationsFrequently asked🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Political Sociology›Generalized Trust Scale
Process / pipelineSocial Trust

Generalized Trust Scale

Generalized Trust in Strangers Scale · Also known as: GTS, Trust in Strangers

The Generalized Trust Scale measures an individual's propensity to trust people in general, particularly strangers with whom they have no direct relationship. Originally developed by Morris Rosenberg in 1956 and later refined by Toshio Yamagishi and colleagues, it has become foundational in research on social capital, civic participation, and intergroup relations.

ScholarGate
  1. Process / pipeline
  2. v1
  3. 3 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

Generalized Trust Scale
Civic Engagement ScaleCommunity Belonging ScaleInstitutional Trust ScaleIntergroup Contact ScaleSocial Cohesion ScaleDemocratic Values ScaleSocial Capital IndexXenophobia Scale

When to use it

Generalized trust is measured in cross-national surveys, civic engagement studies, social capital research, and investigations of intergroup prejudice. It is particularly valuable in comparative political sociology, post-conflict reconciliation research, and studies linking social attitudes to institutional participation. Appropriate for adult populations; adapted versions exist for adolescents.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Extensively validated across 50+ countries with strong psychometric properties
  • Strongly associated with civic participation, volunteering, and institutional trust—robust criterion validity
  • Brief and low-burden administration; easily embedded in multi-item surveys
  • Theoretically grounded in social capital and reciprocal altruism literature
  • Sensitive to historical and institutional context, useful for before–after policy or conflict research
Limitations
  • Unidimensional; does not distinguish between optimistic (benevolence) and prudent (competence) bases of trust
  • Subject to cultural and linguistic interpretation of 'most people' and 'trust'
  • Lacks specificity regarding institutional trust versus interpersonal trust
  • Susceptible to social desirability bias in face-to-face administration

Frequently asked

Is generalized trust the same as institutional trust?

No. Generalized trust refers to trust in people generally (horizontal, interpersonal). Institutional trust refers to confidence in formal organizations (vertical). Both are important; they are correlated but distinct. A person may distrust government institutions while maintaining high generalized trust in neighbors.

What is a typical score, and how do I interpret individual variation?

In most Western democracies, mean scores on a 5-point scale range 2.8–3.8, with standard deviation approximately 0.9–1.1. Scores 1.0–2.4 suggest low trust; 2.5–3.4 moderate; 3.5–5.0 high. Compare individual scores to the sample or population mean rather than absolute thresholds.

Does generalized trust measure optimism or realistic assessment?

Both. Research shows that generalized trust is neither blind optimism nor cynical realism but rather an adaptive heuristic. High-trust individuals cooperate more, which in well-functioning societies generates returns. In dysfunctional environments, high trust may reflect naiveté. Context matters.

Can generalized trust be increased or is it stable?

Empirically, it is relatively stable within individuals over years but responsive to significant events (conflict, economic crisis, institutional breakdown). At the societal level, recovery of trust after crises typically requires years or decades. Targeted contact and cooperative institution-building show modest effects on increasing trust.

Sources

  1. Rosenberg, M. (1956). Misanthropy, political ideology, and political information. Public Opinion Quarterly, 20(2), 274-290. DOI: 10.2307/2088419 ↗
  2. Yamagishi, T., & Yamagishi, M. (1994). Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan. Motivation and Emotion, 18(2), 129-166. DOI: 10.1007/BF02249397 ↗
  3. Uslaner, E. M. (2002). The Moral Foundations of Trust. Cambridge University Press. link ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 3). Generalized Trust in Strangers Scale. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/political-sociology/generalized-trust-scale

Related methods

Civic Engagement ScaleCommunity Belonging ScaleInstitutional Trust ScaleIntergroup Contact ScaleSocial Cohesion Scale

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • Civic Engagement ScalePolitical Sociology↔ compare
  • Community Belonging ScalePolitical Sociology↔ compare
  • Institutional Trust ScalePolitical Sociology↔ compare
  • Intergroup Contact ScalePolitical Sociology↔ compare
  • Social Cohesion ScalePolitical Sociology↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Referenced by

Civic Engagement ScaleCommunity Belonging ScaleDemocratic Values ScaleInstitutional Trust ScaleIntergroup Contact ScaleSocial Capital IndexSocial Cohesion ScaleXenophobia Scale

Similar methods

Institutional Trust ScaleGovernment Trust SurveyPolitical Trust ScaleSocial Capital ScalePolitical Cynicism ScaleOrganizational Trust ScaleSocial Capital IndexVoter Cynicism Scale

Related reference concepts

Psychometrics & Statistics & MethodologyPsychological Testing and PsychometricsPersonality Scales & InventoriesConsumer Opinion & Attitude TestingSocial Structure & OrganizationPersonality Measures

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — Generalized Trust Scale (Generalized Trust in Strangers Scale). Retrieved 2026-07-21 from https://scholargate.app/en/political-sociology/generalized-trust-scale · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
Morris Rosenberg, Toshio Yamagishi
Subfamily
Social Trust
Year
1956–1994
Type
Self-report questionnaire
Related methods
Civic Engagement ScaleCommunity Belonging ScaleInstitutional Trust ScaleIntergroup Contact ScaleSocial Cohesion Scale
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account