FACIT-Spiritual Well-Being Scale (FACIT-Sp)
FACIT-Spiritual Well-Being Scale · Also known as: FACIT-Sp, FACIT-Spiritual
The FACIT-Sp, developed by Peterman and colleagues in 2002, is a 12-item self-report measure of spiritual well-being specifically designed for people with serious illness, particularly cancer. It assesses two dimensions: meaning and peace (the sense that life has purpose and harmony despite illness) and faith (spiritual or religious trust). Part of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) suite, the FACIT-Sp has become a standard measure in oncology research and palliative care, predicting quality of life, treatment outcomes, and psychological well-being in medical populations.
Read the full method
Sign in with a free account to read this section.
Method map
The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.
When to use it
Use in oncology, palliative care, and chronic illness settings as a standard part of psychosocial or quality-of-life assessment. Valuable in research on psychological outcomes in medical populations. Appropriate in mental health care for patients with serious medical diagnoses to assess existential well-being and identify those at risk for depression. Use to monitor spiritual well-being over time during treatment or disease progression. Less suitable for acute care or brief encounters unless addressing existential distress directly.
Strengths & limitations
- Disease-specific relevance: items explicitly reference illness context ('Despite my illness, my sense of purpose remains'); avoids generic spiritual measurement detached from medical reality.
- Comprehensive spirituality construct: captures both existential (meaning, peace) and faith-based dimensions of spiritual well-being, accommodating both religious and secular meaning-making.
- Strong health outcomes association: higher FACIT-Sp scores predict better quality of life, psychological adjustment, treatment adherence, and sometimes survival in cancer and other serious illness populations.
- Brevity and acceptability: 12 items are brief enough for hospitalized or seriously ill patients; well-tolerated even in advanced disease.
- Floor effects in advanced illness: very ill or dying patients may struggle to endorse meaning or peace items, potentially underestimating spiritual resources due to physical symptom burden.
- Conflation of meaning with acceptance: some patients may endorse low meaning/peace scores not from spiritual distress but from unrelenting pain or symptom burden; the scales do not disentangle existential from physical suffering.
- Religious bias: faith subscale may be less relevant or lower in non-religious or secular populations; meaning/peace subscale is more universal.
- Temporal dynamics: spiritual well-being fluctuates with disease trajectory, treatment response, and comorbid depression; a single snapshot may not capture trajectory or treatability.
Frequently asked
How is the FACIT-Sp different from the SWBS (Spiritual Well-Being Scale)?
The SWBS (Paloutzian & Ellison) is 20 items measuring existential and religious well-being generically. The FACIT-Sp is 12 items, specifically contextualized to chronic illness ('Despite my illness, I have a sense of purpose'). In medical populations, the FACIT-Sp is more sensitive and appropriate. Use FACIT-Sp for sick patients, SWBS for general populations.
What should I do if a patient scores low on meaning but high on faith?
This pattern suggests someone with strong religious beliefs but struggling with existential meaning in the context of illness. They may feel abandoned by God despite faith, or feel their illness questions their belief system. Explore the theological struggle: Is the patient angry at God? Do they feel God's presence but lack life purpose? This pattern often responds to meaning-centered or narrative therapy combined with spiritual direction.
Can the FACIT-Sp predict survival or disease outcome?
Some research suggests higher FACIT-Sp scores correlate with better quality of life and possibly longer survival in cancer populations, but the mechanism is unclear. Spiritual well-being may support treatment adherence, health behaviors, and stress reduction, which indirectly influence outcomes. However, do not present FACIT-Sp as a prognostic indicator to patients; it measures well-being, not prognosis.
How do I distinguish spiritual well-being from denial or avoidance?
Someone in denial may endorse high meaning/peace scores while avoiding conversations about prognosis or treatment. Use open-ended questions to explore the content of meaning ('What gives your life purpose right now?') and the patient's realistic understanding of their illness. Genuine spiritual well-being coexists with medical realism; avoidance-based coping does not.
Sources
- Peterman, A. H., Fitchett, G., Brady, M. J., Hernandez, L., & Cella, D. (2002). Measuring spiritual well-being in people with cancer: The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy–Spiritual Well-Being Scale. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 24(1), 49–58. DOI: 10.1207/S15324796ABM2401_06 ↗
How to cite this page
ScholarGate. (2026, June 3). FACIT-Spiritual Well-Being Scale. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/psychology-of-religion/functional-assessment-chronic-illness-spiritual
Which method?
Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.
- Brief RCOPEPsychology Of Religion↔ compare
- DSESPsychology Of Religion↔ compare
- EWB ScalePsychology Of Religion↔ compare
- SBIPsychology Of Religion↔ compare