Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfallsApplicationsFrequently asked🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Psychology Of Religion›Spiritual Transcendence Scale (STS)
Process / pipelinespiritual transcendence and connection

Spiritual Transcendence Scale (STS)

Spiritual Transcendence Scale · Also known as: STS, Spiritual Transcendence

The Spiritual Transcendence Scale (STS), developed by Piedmont in 1999, is a 24-item self-report measure of spiritual transcendence: the human capacity to experience connection to something beyond oneself—whether understood as God, nature, humanity, or the sacred. The STS conceptualizes spiritual transcendence as a personality trait distinct from religious adherence or institutional participation, measured through three facets: Prayer Fulfillment (satisfaction from spiritual practices), Universality (sense of interconnection with all people and life), and Connectedness (sense of deep connection to the divine or sacred). The scale has become influential in understanding spirituality as a psychological dimension orthogonal to the Big Five personality traits.

ScholarGate
  1. Process / pipeline
  2. v1
  3. 2 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

STS
DSESEWB ScaleFACIT-SpQuest Scale

When to use it

Use in personality and trait assessments to understand individual differences in capacity for transcendent experience and meaning-making. Valuable in research on spirituality as a protective factor against depression, substance abuse, and other mental health outcomes. Appropriate in clinical contexts where meaning, connection, and resilience are therapeutic targets (particularly in addiction recovery, grief counseling, and existential therapy). Use in organizational and social research on altruism, prosocial behavior, and organizational climate. Less suitable for rapid clinical screening; better used as part of comprehensive personality or psychological assessment.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Trait-based personality measurement: conceptualizes spirituality as a stable individual difference (like extraversion or conscientiousness), distinct from religious behavior or belief content.
  • Multidimensional assessment: captures prayer/practice, universal connection, and felt spiritual connection—three distinct facets of transcendence.
  • Robust psychometrics: demonstrated good internal consistency and validity across diverse populations; less influenced by social desirability than many spiritual measures.
  • Predictive validity for resilience: high STS scores predict better mental health outcomes, lower substance abuse, and more effective coping in addiction and trauma populations.
Limitations
  • Secular populations may score low without distress: non-religious individuals who experience awe through nature, science, or human connection may legitimately score lower on prayer-focused and divine-connection items.
  • Cultural variation in transcendence expression: transcendence manifests differently across traditions and cultures; Western individualist framing of the scale may not capture communal or non-Western expressions of spiritual connection.
  • State-trait confusion: spiritual experiences and sense of connection fluctuate with life events and mental state; a single STS administration may not reflect stable trait transcendence.
  • Limited clinical utility without context: high STS scores do not automatically indicate psychological health; someone may have strong transcendence capacity but still struggle with depression, addiction, or relational difficulties.

Frequently asked

How is the STS different from religiosity scales like the DUREL or I/E Scale?

Religiosity scales measure religious involvement (belief, practice, motivation). The STS measures the underlying spiritual trait—capacity for transcendence—which can be expressed through religion but also through nature, art, science, service, or secular meaning-making. Someone may be highly spiritual (high STS) but non-religious, or religious without strong transcendence capacity (low STS). Use STS for trait personality; use DUREL/I/E for religious dimensions.

Can someone score high on Prayer Fulfillment but low on Universality?

Yes. This pattern suggests someone whose transcendence is expressed through personal spiritual practice (prayer, meditation) but less through sense of universal connection with others. They may be introverted or practice religion in isolation rather than community. No pathology; just a profile showing which facets of transcendence are most developed.

What should I do with a patient who scores low on the STS?

Low STS scores do not indicate disease or pathology. Assess whether the person experiences meaning through other routes: relationships, values, work, intellectual pursuits, nature. If low STS is accompanied by depression, hopelessness, or lack of meaning, explore whether cultivating transcendent experiences (meditation, nature, contemplative practice, community service) might support well-being. Do not impose spiritual development; follow the person's authentic interest.

How does the STS relate to health outcomes like longevity or cardiovascular disease?

Research shows mixed results. Some studies find high STS correlates with better health behaviors and outcomes; others find weaker associations. The relationship may be mediated by meaning, social connection, and stress reduction rather than directly caused by transcendence. Use STS as one indicator of psychosocial strengths, not as a medical predictor. Always assess behavioral and medical risk factors directly.

Sources

  1. Piedmont, R. L. (1999). Does spirituality have a place in personality science? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(1), 3–13. link ↗
  2. Piedmont, R. L. (2001). Spiritual transcendence as a predictor of psychosocial outcome from an outpatient substance abuse treatment program. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 15(4), 338–345. link ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 3). Spiritual Transcendence Scale. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/psychology-of-religion/transcendence-scale

Related methods

DSESEWB ScaleFACIT-SpQuest Scale

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • DSESPsychology Of Religion↔ compare
  • EWB ScalePsychology Of Religion↔ compare
  • FACIT-SpPsychology Of Religion↔ compare
  • Quest ScalePsychology Of Religion↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Referenced by

DSES

Similar methods

Spiritual Transcendence ScaleDSESQuest ScaleSpiritual Well-Being ScaleDURELSpiritual Care Competence ScaleI/E Religiosity ScaleRCI-10

Related reference concepts

Personality Scales & InventoriesReligious ExperiencePrayer, Meditation, and ContemplationReligionPersonality MeasuresConversion and Religious Transformation

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — STS (Spiritual Transcendence Scale). Retrieved 2026-07-20 from https://scholargate.app/en/psychology-of-religion/transcendence-scale · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
Ralph L. Piedmont
Subfamily
spiritual transcendence and connection
Year
1999
Type
Self-report
Related methods
DSESEWB ScaleFACIT-SpQuest Scale
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account