Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfalls🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Decision-making›WEight deNomination based on Slope coefficient for objective weighting
MCDMWeight Objectivecrisp

WEight deNomination based on Slope coefficient for objective weighting

WENSLO (WEight deNomination based on Slope coefficient for objective weighting) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Pamucar, D., Ecer, F., Gligorić, Z., Gligorić, M., Deveci, M. in 2024. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.

ScholarGate
  1. MCDM
  2. v1
  3. 1 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

WENSLO
AHPSORTAPLOCOARASAROMANARTASICOBRACOCOSOCODAS

When to use it

WENSLO assigns higher weight to criteria whose normalised values change most steeply (in absolute terms) as we move through the alternatives in rank order. A criterion with a flat profile (all alternatives similar) gets β≈0 → low weight. A criterion with a steep profile gets high weight.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Follows a transparent, reproducible computational procedure that can be audited step by step.
  • Handles multiple criteria of differing scales and units within a single decision matrix.
Limitations
  • Results depend on the chosen normalisation, weights, and parameter settings.

Sources

  1. Pamucar, D., Ecer, F., Gligorić, Z., Gligorić, M., Deveci, M. (2024). A Novel WENSLO and ALWAS Multicriteria Methodology and Its Application to Green Growth Performance Evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management DOI: 10.1109/TEM.2023.3321697 ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 2). WEight deNomination based on Slope coefficient for objective weighting. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/decision-making/wenslo

Related methods

AHPSORTAPLOCOARASAROMANARTASICOBRACOCOSOCODAS

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • AHPSORTDecision-making↔ compare
  • APLOCODecision-making↔ compare
  • ARASDecision-making↔ compare
  • AROMANDecision-making↔ compare
  • ARTASIDecision-making↔ compare
  • COBRADecision-making↔ compare
  • COCOSODecision-making↔ compare
  • CODASDecision-making↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Similar methods

B-WENSLOLOPCOWRAWECSIWECDIBRFUCOM-FFUZZY-SIWECMARA

Related reference concepts

Decision Support SystemsDecision MakingWeighted ScoresEvaluation CriteriaCriteria for Decision-Making under Risk and UncertaintyParticipative Decision Making

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — WENSLO (WEight deNomination based on Slope coefficient for objective weighting). Retrieved 2026-07-20 from https://scholargate.app/en/decision-making/wenslo · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
Pamucar, D., Ecer, F., Gligorić, Z., Gligorić, M., Deveci, M.
Subfamily
Weight Objective
Year
2024
Type
Weight Objective (envelope/slope ratio of accumulation polyline)
Value Space
crisp
Uncertainty
None
Compensation
N/A
Rank Reversal
No
Related methods
AHPSORTAPLOCOARASAROMANARTASICOBRACOCOSOCODAS
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account