Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfalls🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Decision-making›Spatial Ordered Weighted Averaging
MCDMRankingcrisp

Spatial Ordered Weighted Averaging

SOWA (Spatial Ordered Weighted Averaging) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Makropoulos, C. K.; Butler, D. in 2003/2006. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.

ScholarGate
  1. MCDM
  2. v1
  3. 1 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

SOWA
AHPANPBWMCRITICENTROPYFUCOMMERECSWARA

When to use it

V(A^s_i) reflects both criterion performance and the spatial risk attitude of the zone the alternative belongs to. An alternative with extreme values (very high on its best criterion, very low on its worst) will be strongly penalised if it lies in a pessimistic zone (low ORness) and strongly rewarded if it lies in an optimistic zone (high ORness). Always inspect the ORness map (output G.orness_per_zone) and the rank-shift chart (H3) to understand how zone assignments are driving the result. The zone_order_weights assignment is the key modelling decision — it embeds a spatial theory of risk.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Follows a transparent, reproducible computational procedure that can be audited step by step.
  • Handles multiple criteria of differing scales and units within a single decision matrix.
Limitations
  • May exhibit rank reversal when alternatives are added to or removed from the set.

Sources

  1. Makropoulos, C. K., Butler, D. (2006). Spatial ordered weighted averaging: incorporating spatially variable attitude towards risk in spatial multi-criteria decision-making. Environmental Modelling & Software DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2004.10.010 ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 2). Spatial Ordered Weighted Averaging. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/decision-making/sowa

Related methods

AHPANPBWMCRITICENTROPYFUCOMMERECSWARA

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • AHPDecision-making↔ compare
  • ANPDecision-making↔ compare
  • BWMDecision-making↔ compare
  • CRITICDecision-making↔ compare
  • ENTROPYDecision-making↔ compare
  • FUCOMDecision-making↔ compare
  • MERECDecision-making↔ compare
  • SWARADecision-making↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Similar methods

OWALOCAL-OWASAWWASPASROUGH-DRSASWARAHF-SAWQR-SAW

Related reference concepts

Decision Support SystemsDecision MakingWeighted ScoresMultidimensional ScalingDecision Making SkillsCriteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — SOWA (Spatial Ordered Weighted Averaging). Retrieved 2026-07-20 from https://scholargate.app/en/decision-making/sowa · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
Makropoulos, C. K.; Butler, D.
Subfamily
Ranking
Year
2003/2006
Type
Zone-stratified OWA — order weights λ k vary per spatial zone, encoding spatially heterogeneous risk attitudes (ORness) while criterion weights w k remain global
Value Space
crisp
Uncertainty
None
Compensation
partial
Rank Reversal
Yes
Related methods
AHPANPBWMCRITICENTROPYFUCOMMERECSWARA
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account