Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfallsApplicationsFrequently asked🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Applied Physics›UNIFAC
Process / pipelineThermodynamic Modeling

UNIFAC

UNIFAC (Universal Functional-group Activity Coefficient) Model · Also known as: UNIFAC predictive model, UNIQUAC functional-group contribution

UNIFAC (Universal Functional-group Activity Coefficient) is a predictive model for liquid-phase activity coefficients of multicomponent mixtures. Developed by Fredenslund, Jones, and Prausnitz in 1975, it decomposes molecules into functional groups and uses group interaction parameters to estimate non-ideal behavior. UNIFAC is revolutionary because it can predict phase equilibria for mixtures never experimentally measured, making it invaluable for process design and chemical engineering.

ScholarGate
  1. Process / pipeline
  2. v1
  3. 3 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

UNIFAC
Peng-Robinson Equation o…Pinch AnalysisReactive Distillation

When to use it

Use UNIFAC to predict liquid-phase properties of organic mixtures when experimental data are unavailable. It is ideal for preliminary process design, feasibility studies, and screening candidate solvents. Apply to nonpolar and slightly polar compounds. Avoid for hydrogen-bonding systems, aqueous solutions, polymers, and ionic liquids unless specialized UNIFAC variants are used (UNIFAC-FV, modified UNIFAC, COSMO-SAC).

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Predictive without experimental mixture data; saves time and resources
  • Mechanistic basis (group contributions); physically interpretable
  • Works for infinite dilution and concentrated solutions
  • Widely available; implemented in commercial process simulators
Limitations
  • Limited to organic and weakly polar compounds; fails for water, alcohols, and strongly associating systems
  • Accuracy depends on group parameter quality; some rare functional groups have poorly fitted parameters
  • Cannot predict effects of temperature on group interactions well; requires variants like UNIFAC-T
  • Does not account for molecular size explicitly; may fail for very large molecules

Frequently asked

Why can't UNIFAC predict water behavior accurately?

Water has strong hydrogen bonding, which is not captured by UNIFAC's group interaction approach. Specialized models (NRTL-HB, UNIFAC-FV with hydrogen bonding terms) are needed for aqueous solutions.

How do I handle a functional group not in the UNIFAC database?

Use the closest chemically similar group or estimate parameters from similar groups. Alternatively, use more general models (COSMO-SAC) that derive activity coefficients from quantum-chemical calculations.

What is the difference between UNIFAC and modified UNIFAC?

Modified UNIFAC (Gmehling) has refined interaction parameters from additional experimental data, improving accuracy for polar and aromatic compounds. The model structure is the same.

Sources

  1. Fredenslund, A., Jones, R. L., & Prausnitz, J. M. (1975). Group-contribution estimation of activity coefficients in nonideal liquid mixtures. AIChE Journal, 21(6), 1086-1099. DOI: 10.1002/aic.690210607 ↗
  2. Prausnitz, J. M., Lichtenthaler, R. N., & de Azevedo, E. G. (2001). Molecular Thermodynamics of Fluid-Phase Equilibria (3rd ed.). Prentice Hall. ISBN: 978-0-13-977745-6
  3. Gmehling, J., Li, J., & Schiller, M. (1993). A modified UNIFAC model for the prediction of phase equilibria and excess enthalpies. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 32(1), 178-193. link ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 3). UNIFAC (Universal Functional-group Activity Coefficient) Model. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/applied-physics/unifac

Related methods

Peng-Robinson Equation of StatePinch AnalysisReactive Distillation

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • Peng-Robinson Equation of StateApplied Physics↔ compare
  • Pinch AnalysisApplied Physics↔ compare
  • Reactive DistillationApplied Physics↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Referenced by

Peng-Robinson Equation of StatePinch AnalysisReactive Distillation

Similar methods

Peng-Robinson Equation of StateStefan-Maxwell DiffusionCALPHADAdsorption Isotherm (Langmuir-Freundlich)McCabe-Thiele MethodPFR ModelCSTR ModelDensity Functional Theory

Related reference concepts

Ion Activity and Electrolyte ThermodynamicsChemical ThermodynamicsPolymer Solution ThermodynamicsPhase Equilibria and the Phase RuleSolvation and Continuum ModelsPhysical Chemistry

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — UNIFAC (UNIFAC (Universal Functional-group Activity Coefficient) Model). Retrieved 2026-07-21 from https://scholargate.app/en/applied-physics/unifac · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
Aage Fredenslund, Russell Jones, John Prausnitz
Subfamily
Thermodynamic Modeling
Year
1975
Type
Activity coefficient model; predictive liquid-phase property method
Related methods
Peng-Robinson Equation of StatePinch AnalysisReactive Distillation
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account