Methoden vergleichen
Prüfen Sie die ausgewählten Methoden nebeneinander; abweichende Zeilen sind hervorgehoben.
| HEdPERF Skala zur Leistungsmessung in der Hochschulbildung× | American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI)× | E-S-QUAL Skala zur Messung der Servicequalität im elektronischen Handel× | SERVPERF-Skala× | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fachgebiet | Marketingmanagement | Marketingmanagement | Marketingmanagement | Marketingmanagement |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Entstehungsjahr≠ | 2003 | 1996 | 2005 | 1992 |
| Urheber≠ | Ganesan Srikanthan, John F. Dalrymple | Claes Fornell, Michael D. Johnson, Eugene W. Anderson, Jaesung Cha, Barbara E. Bryant | A. Parasuraman, Valerie A. Zeithaml, Anantharanthan Malhotra | Joseph J. Cronin Jr., Steven A. Taylor |
| Typ≠ | Multi-dimensional higher education service quality scale | Structural equation model for satisfaction and loyalty | Multi-dimensional electronic service quality scale | Performance-only service quality scale |
| Wegweisende Quelle≠ | Srikanthan, G., & Dalrymple, J. F. (2003). Developing a Holistic Model for Quality in Higher Education. Quality in Higher Education, 9(2), 123-138. DOI ↗ | Fornell, C., Johnson, M. D., Anderson, E. W., Cha, J., & Bryant, B. E. (1996). The American Customer Satisfaction Index: Nature, Purpose, and Findings. Journal of Marketing, 60(4), 7-18. DOI ↗ | Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Malhotra, A. (2005). E-S-QUAL: A Multiple-Item Scale for Assessing Electronic Service Quality. Journal of Service Research, 7(3), 213-233. DOI ↗ | Cronin, J. J., & Taylor, S. A. (1992). Measuring Service Quality: A Reexamination and Extension. Journal of Marketing, 56(3), 55-68. DOI ↗ |
| Aliasnamen | HEdPERF, Educational Service Quality Scale | ACSI, National Customer Satisfaction Index | E-S-QUAL, Online Service Quality Scale | Perception-Only Service Quality Scale, SERVPERF-Performance Model |
| Verwandt≠ | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
| Zusammenfassung≠ | HEdPERF is a 41-item scale designed specifically to measure service quality in higher education contexts, developed by Srikanthan and Dalrymple (2003). Extending SERVQUAL's framework to academic environments, HEdPERF captures unique dimensions of educational service: Academic Aspects (teaching quality, curriculum relevance), Non-Academic Aspects (administrative efficiency, physical facilities), Reputation (institutional prestige, employability), Access (availability of information, ease of enrollment), and Programme Issues (program content, skill development). The scale addresses the distinctive characteristics of educational services, which blend academic content delivery with student support and institutional experience. | The American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI), developed by Fornell and colleagues in 1996, is a structural equation modeling-based approach to measuring and predicting customer satisfaction across industries and over time. ACSI assesses customer expectations, perceived value, perceived quality, complaints, and loyalty in a unified framework. Since 1994, ACSI data has been collected quarterly on thousands of customers across diverse U.S. industries, making it a key economic indicator and benchmark for organizational performance. | E-S-QUAL is a 22-item scale developed by Parasuraman, Zeithaml, and Malhotra (2005) to measure service quality in electronic commerce and digital service environments. Adapting the foundational SERVQUAL dimensions to online contexts, E-S-QUAL assesses four core dimensions: Efficiency (ability to complete transactions quickly), Fulfillment (accurate order fulfillment and on-time delivery), System Availability (website uptime and technical performance), and Privacy (security of customer data and transactions). The scale captures both service delivery (how the website functions) and service recovery (how problems are handled). | SERVPERF, developed by Cronin and Taylor in 1992, is a streamlined service quality measurement instrument that evaluates perceived service performance only, without the expectation component. Using 22 items identical in content to SERVQUAL but applied to perception alone, SERVPERF reduces survey burden while maintaining dimensional coverage of Tangibles, Reliability, Responsiveness, Assurance, and Empathy. Empirical evidence suggests SERVPERF performs equally well or better than SERVQUAL in explaining overall satisfaction. |
| ScholarGateDatensatz ↗ |
|
|
|
|