Methoden vergleichen
Prüfen Sie die ausgewählten Methoden nebeneinander; abweichende Zeilen sind hervorgehoben.
| ERS Point-Optimal Unit-Root Test× | Augmented-Dickey-Fuller (ADF)-Test auf Einheitswurzel× | DF-GLS-Test: Dickey-Fuller-GLS-Test auf Einheitswurzeln nach Trendbereinigung× | Phillips-Perron (PP) Einheitswurzel-Test× | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fachgebiet | Ökonometrie | Ökonometrie | Ökonometrie | Ökonometrie |
| Familie≠ | Hypothesis test | Regression model | Hypothesis test | Regression model |
| Entstehungsjahr≠ | 1996 | 1979 | 1996 | 1988 |
| Urheber≠ | Elliott, Rothenberg & Stock | David A. Dickey & Wayne A. Fuller | Elliott, Rothenberg & Stock | Peter C. B. Phillips & Pierre Perron |
| Typ≠ | One-sided parametric unit-root test | Unit-root test for stationarity | One-sided t-test on GLS-detrended series | Unit-root test for stationarity |
| Wegweisende Quelle≠ | Elliott, G., Rothenberg, T. J., & Stock, J. H. (1996). Efficient tests for an autoregressive unit root. Econometrica, 64(4), 813–836. DOI ↗ | Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366a), 427–431. DOI ↗ | Elliott, G., Rothenberg, T. J., & Stock, J. H. (1996). Efficient tests for an autoregressive unit root. Econometrica, 64(4), 813–836. DOI ↗ | Phillips, P. C. B., & Perron, P. (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika, 75(2), 335–346. DOI ↗ |
| Aliasnamen≠ | ERS P-test, Point-Optimal Unit-Root Test, ERS PT statistic, ERS Nokta-Optimal Birim Kök Testi | ADF test, Dickey-Fuller test, unit root test, Genişletilmiş Dickey-Fuller testi | Elliott-Rothenberg-Stock test, ERS unit-root test, GLS-detrended Dickey-Fuller test, DF-GLS birim kök testi | PP test, Phillips-Perron unit root test, Phillips-Perron birim kök testi |
| Verwandt≠ | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
| Zusammenfassung≠ | The Elliott-Rothenberg-Stock (ERS) Point-Optimal test, introduced in their landmark 1996 Econometrica paper, is a near-efficient parametric procedure for testing whether a univariate time series contains a unit root. By first applying GLS detrending at a carefully chosen local-to-unity value and then computing a likelihood-ratio-type statistic, it achieves power close to the Gaussian power envelope—making it one of the most powerful unit-root tests available to applied econometricians. | The Augmented Dickey-Fuller (ADF) test is the most widely used test for a unit root — that is, for whether a time series is non-stationary and must be differenced before modelling. Introduced by David Dickey and Wayne Fuller in 1979 and extended by Said and Dickey in 1984 to series with higher-order autocorrelation, it regresses the change in the series on its lagged level plus lagged differences and asks whether the lagged-level coefficient is zero. | The DF-GLS test, introduced by Elliott, Rothenberg, and Stock (1996), is a modified augmented Dickey-Fuller procedure that applies generalized least squares (GLS) detrending before the standard unit-root regression. By removing deterministic components under a local alternative rather than the null hypothesis, the test achieves near-optimal power for detecting stationarity in time series, making it the preferred unit-root test in applied econometrics when a trend or intercept is present. | The Phillips-Perron test, proposed by Peter Phillips and Pierre Perron in 1988, tests for a unit root in a time series, like the Augmented Dickey-Fuller test, but corrects for autocorrelation and heteroskedasticity in the errors non-parametrically rather than by adding lagged differences. It runs a simple Dickey-Fuller regression and then adjusts the test statistic using a long-run variance estimate, so the practitioner need not choose a lag length for the regression itself. |
| ScholarGateDatensatz ↗ |
|
|
|
|