ScholarGate
Assistent
MCDMGame-theoretic / formal IR

Crisis Bargaining Game

A crisis bargaining game is a formal, usually extensive-form model in which two states sequentially choose to challenge, escalate, stand firm, or back down during an international dispute, and the analyst solves for the equilibrium pattern of escalation and concession. Building on Schelling's strategy of conflict and given an influential treatment in Fearon's (1994) model of escalation as a war of attrition, these games make explicit how incomplete information about each side's resolve, and the costs each pays for backing down, shape whether a crisis ends in mutual accommodation, capitulation, or war.

Åbn i MethodMindSnartAnvend, sammenlign, få vejledning
Værktøjer og ressourcer
Hent slides
Lær og udforsk
VideoSnart

Læs hele metoden

Kun for medlemmer

Log ind med en gratis konto for at læse dette afsnit.

Log ind

Metodekort

Nabolaget af beslægtede metoder — vælg en knude for at udforske.

Kilder

  1. Fearon, J. D. (1994). Domestic political audiences and the escalation of international disputes. American Political Science Review, 88(3), 577–592. DOI: 10.2307/2944796

Sådan citerer du denne side

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Game-Theoretic Models of International Crisis Bargaining. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/da/international-relations/crisis-bargaining-game

Hvilken metode?

Stil denne metode ved siden af dens nærmeste slægtninge, og læs dem side om side — biblioteket lægger bøgerne på bordet; valget er dit.

Sammenlign side om side

Refereret af

ScholarGateCrisis Bargaining Game (Game-Theoretic Models of International Crisis Bargaining). Hentet 2026-06-24 fra https://scholargate.app/da/international-relations/crisis-bargaining-game · Datasæt: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026