ScholarGate
Assistent
Process / pipelineObservational quantitative IR

Territorial Conflict Analysis

Territorial conflict analysis tests the proposition — central to the 'territorial explanation of war' — that what states fight over matters, and that disputes over territory are especially war-prone. Vasquez and Henehan (2001) operationalize this by coding disputes for the issue at stake (territory, policy, regime) and comparing how often each type escalates to war. The consistent finding that territorial disputes are more likely to lead to war than other kinds reframes the study of conflict around the contested issue rather than only the attributes of the disputants.

Åbn i MethodMindSnartAnvend, sammenlign, få vejledning
Værktøjer og ressourcer
Hent slides
Lær og udforsk
VideoSnart

Læs hele metoden

Kun for medlemmer

Log ind med en gratis konto for at læse dette afsnit.

Log ind

Metodekort

Nabolaget af beslægtede metoder — vælg en knude for at udforske.

Kilder

  1. Vasquez, J., & Henehan, M. T. (2001). Territorial disputes and the probability of war, 1816–1992. Journal of Peace Research, 38(2), 123–138. DOI: 10.1177/0022343301038002001

Sådan citerer du denne side

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Analysis of Territorial Disputes and the Probability of War. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/da/international-relations/territorial-conflict-analysis

Hvilken metode?

Stil denne metode ved siden af dens nærmeste slægtninge, og læs dem side om side — biblioteket lægger bøgerne på bordet; valget er dit.

Sammenlign side om side
ScholarGateTerritorial Conflict Analysis (Analysis of Territorial Disputes and the Probability of War). Hentet 2026-06-24 fra https://scholargate.app/da/international-relations/territorial-conflict-analysis · Datasæt: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026