ScholarGate
Assistent
MCDMGame-theoretic / formal IR

Bargaining Model of War

The bargaining model of war, given its canonical statement by James Fearon in 'Rationalist Explanations for War' (1995), treats war not as the failure of reason but as a failure of bargaining. Because fighting is costly and uncertain, there almost always exists a peaceful division of the disputed stakes that both rational states would prefer to the gamble of war. The puzzle, and the model's central contribution, is to identify the specific conditions — private information with incentives to misrepresent, commitment problems, and issue indivisibility — under which rational, unitary states nonetheless fail to reach such a settlement.

Åbn i MethodMindSnartAnvend, sammenlign, få vejledning
Værktøjer og ressourcer
Hent slides
Lær og udforsk
VideoSnart

Læs hele metoden

Kun for medlemmer

Log ind med en gratis konto for at læse dette afsnit.

Log ind

Metodekort

Nabolaget af beslægtede metoder — vælg en knude for at udforske.

Kilder

  1. Fearon, J. D. (1995). Rationalist explanations for war. International Organization, 49(3), 379–414. DOI: 10.1017/S0020818300033324

Sådan citerer du denne side

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Rationalist Bargaining Model of War (Fearon). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/da/international-relations/bargaining-model-of-war

Hvilken metode?

Stil denne metode ved siden af dens nærmeste slægtninge, og læs dem side om side — biblioteket lægger bøgerne på bordet; valget er dit.

Sammenlign side om side

Refereret af

ScholarGateBargaining Model of War (Rationalist Bargaining Model of War (Fearon)). Hentet 2026-06-24 fra https://scholargate.app/da/international-relations/bargaining-model-of-war · Datasæt: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026