ScholarGate
Assistent
Process / pipelineCausal inference / confounding adjustment

Propensity Score Methods in Criminology

Propensity score methods estimate the causal effect of a criminal-justice treatment — such as incarceration, gang membership, a diversion program, or arrest — from observational data, where random assignment is impossible. Building on Rosenbaum and Rubin's 1983 framework and adapted to crime research by Apel, Sweeten, and others, the approach summarizes many confounders into a single probability of treatment, then matches, weights, or stratifies on it to approximate a randomized comparison. This page covers the criminological application; for the general estimators see propensity-score-matching and propensity-score-weighting.

Åbn i MethodMindSnartAnvend, sammenlign, få vejledning
Værktøjer og ressourcer
Hent slides
Lær og udforsk
VideoSnart

Læs hele metoden

Kun for medlemmer

Log ind med en gratis konto for at læse dette afsnit.

Log ind

Metodekort

Nabolaget af beslægtede metoder — vælg en knude for at udforske.

Kilder

  1. Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI: 10.1093/biomet/70.1.41
  2. Apel, R. J., & Sweeten, G. (2010). Propensity score matching in criminology and criminal justice. In Handbook of Quantitative Criminology (pp. 543–562). Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-77650-7_26

Sådan citerer du denne side

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Propensity Score Methods for Causal Inference in Criminology. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/da/criminology/propensity-score-criminology

Hvilken metode?

Stil denne metode ved siden af dens nærmeste slægtninge, og læs dem side om side — biblioteket lægger bøgerne på bordet; valget er dit.

Sammenlign side om side

Refereret af

ScholarGatePropensity Score Methods in Criminology (Propensity Score Methods for Causal Inference in Criminology). Hentet 2026-06-25 fra https://scholargate.app/da/criminology/propensity-score-criminology · Datasæt: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026