Configurational Strategy Analysis (fsQCA)
Configurational strategy analysis applies fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to strategy questions, asking not which single variable drives an outcome but which combinations of conditions together produce it. The method rests on Charles Ragin's set-theoretic framework, fully developed in his 2008 book Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond, which treats causes as set-membership relations and uses Boolean logic to find the configurations of conditions that are sufficient for an outcome. Peer Fiss's 2011 Academy of Management Journal article brought the approach into mainstream strategy and organization research, showing how fuzzy sets can express organizational typologies and introducing the distinction between core and peripheral conditions. The defining premises are equifinality - several different recipes can lead to the same outcome - and causal asymmetry - the conditions for success are not the mirror image of those for failure.
阅读完整方法
使用免费账户登录即可阅读本节。
方法图谱
相关方法的邻域——选择一个节点以展开探索。
来源
- Ragin, C. C. (2008). Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond. University of Chicago Press. ISBN: 9780226702759
- Fiss, P. C. (2011). Building Better Causal Theories: A Fuzzy Set Approach to Typologies in Organization Research. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 393-420. DOI: 10.5465/amj.2011.60263120 ↗
如何引用本页
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Configurational Strategy Analysis (Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis for Strategy). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/zh/strategic-management/fsqca-configurational-strategy
选用哪种方法?
将本方法与其最相近的同类并置,并排研读——本馆将书籍铺陈于案上,取舍则由您定夺。
- Cross-Impact Analysis战略管理↔ 比较
- Disruptive Innovation Analysis战略管理↔ 比较
- Dynamic Capabilities Measurement战略管理↔ 比较
- Porter's Five Forces Industry Analysis战略管理↔ 比较