ScholarGate
助手
Latent structureSociology / psychology of religion measurement

Glock-Stark Religiosity Dimensions

The Glock-Stark framework, set out in Charles Glock and Rodney Stark's 1965 Religion and Society in Tension, recast religiosity from a single global trait into five analytically distinct dimensions of religious commitment: belief (ideological), practice (ritualistic), experience (experiential), knowledge (intellectual), and consequences (the effects of religion on everyday conduct). The core claim is that an individual can rank high on one dimension and low on another, so a one-number measure of 'how religious' someone is conceals more than it reveals. Operationally, each dimension is tapped by its own cluster of survey items, scaled separately, and the correlations among the dimensions are themselves an object of study. This multidimensional measurement model became the template for nearly all later psychometric work on religiousness.

在 MethodMind 中打开即将推出应用、比较、获取指导
工具与资源
下载幻灯片
学习与探索
视频即将推出

阅读完整方法

仅限会员

使用免费账户登录即可阅读本节。

登录

方法图谱

相关方法的邻域——选择一个节点以展开探索。

来源

  1. Glock, C. Y., & Stark, R. (1965). Religion and Society in Tension. Chicago: Rand McNally. link
  2. Huber, S., & Huber, O. W. (2012). The Centrality of Religiosity Scale (CRS). Religions, 3(3), 710-724. DOI: 10.3390/rel3030710

如何引用本页

ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Glock-Stark Multidimensional Religiosity (Five Dimensions of Religious Commitment). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/zh/religious-studies/glock-stark-religiosity

选用哪种方法?

将本方法与其最相近的同类并置,并排研读——本馆将书籍铺陈于案上,取舍则由您定夺。

并排比较

被引用于

ScholarGateGlock-Stark Religiosity Dimensions (Glock-Stark Multidimensional Religiosity (Five Dimensions of Religious Commitment)). 于 2026-06-24 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/religious-studies/glock-stark-religiosity · 数据集: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026