Authorship Attribution of Canonical Texts
Authorship attribution of canonical texts uses computational stylometry to test who wrote disputed sacred and classical writings, most famously the letters attributed to Paul. Several New Testament epistles bear Paul's name but have long been suspected, on historical and stylistic grounds, of coming from later hands; stylometry brings quantitative evidence to the question. The approach profiles each author's style from large numbers of features, especially function-word frequencies, and either classifies a disputed text to the closest candidate or verifies whether it could plausibly belong to a claimed author against a field of impostors. Jacques Savoy's 2019 study revisited the entire Pauline corpus with modern methods, including Burrows's Delta, and found that it clusters into groups consistent with the traditional distinction between undisputed and disputed letters.
阅读完整方法
使用免费账户登录即可阅读本节。
方法图谱
相关方法的邻域——选择一个节点以展开探索。
来源
- Savoy, J. (2019). Authorship of Pauline epistles revisited. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 70(10), 1089-1097. DOI: 10.1002/asi.24176 ↗
- Burrows, J. (2002). 'Delta': a Measure of Stylistic Difference and a Guide to Likely Authorship. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 17(3), 267-287. DOI: 10.1093/llc/17.3.267 ↗
如何引用本页
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Authorship Attribution of Canonical Texts (Computational Verification of Disputed Sacred Writings). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/zh/religious-studies/authorship-attribution-canonical-texts
选用哪种方法?
将本方法与其最相近的同类并置,并排研读——本馆将书籍铺陈于案上,取舍则由您定夺。
- Intertextuality AnalysisReligious Studies↔ 比较
- Scripture StylometryReligious Studies↔ 比较
- Source Criticism (Documentary Hypothesis)Religious Studies↔ 比较
- Variant Collation and CBGMReligious Studies↔ 比较