Citation Context and Sentiment Analysis
Citation context and sentiment analysis is the scientometric text-mining technique that reads the words around a citation to recover why one paper cites another and with what attitude. Standard citation counting treats every citation as an equal, polarity-free vote, but Simone Teufel, Advaith Siddharthan and Dan Tidhar's 2006 EMNLP work showed that citations serve distinct rhetorical functions — using a method, contrasting with prior work, acknowledging a basis, or merely referencing in passing — and that these functions can be classified automatically from the citing sentence. Awais Athar's 2011 work extended this to sentiment, distinguishing positive, neutral, and negative (critical) citations using sentence-structure features. Together these methods turn the raw citation graph into a typed, sentiment-bearing graph, enabling more meaningful impact measures, better citation indexers, and summaries of how a paper has been received.
阅读完整方法
使用免费账户登录即可阅读本节。
方法图谱
相关方法的邻域——选择一个节点以展开探索。
来源
- Teufel, S., Siddharthan, A., & Tidhar, D. (2006). Automatic classification of citation function. In Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP 2006), 103-110. link ↗
- Athar, A. (2011). Sentiment analysis of citations using sentence structure-based features. In Proceedings of the ACL 2011 Student Session, 81-87. link ↗
如何引用本页
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Citation Context and Sentiment Analysis (Citation Function and Polarity Classification). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/zh/bibliometrics/citation-context-sentiment-analysis
选用哪种方法?
将本方法与其最相近的同类并置,并排研读——本馆将书籍铺陈于案上,取舍则由您定夺。
- BM25 Probabilistic Ranking (Okapi)文献计量学↔ 比较
- Mean Average Precision (MAP)文献计量学↔ 比较
- Normalized Discounted Cumulative Gain (nDCG)文献计量学↔ 比较