ScholarGate
助手
Latent structureScale / measurement

多组内容效度

多组内容效度将标准内容效度指数(CVI)程序进行了扩展,通过计算和比较两个或多个不同的专家小组或亚组的项目和量表层面的效度指数。它确保量表的项目不仅总体上被认为是相关的和有代表性的,而且在每个目标亚组内也是如此,从而支持该工具在不同群体间的可推广性。

在 MethodMind 中打开即将推出视频即将推出Download slides

阅读完整方法

仅限会员

使用免费账户登录即可阅读本节。

登录

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

来源

  1. Polit, D. F. & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 29(5), 489–497. DOI: 10.1002/nur.20147
  2. Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), 382–385. DOI: 10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017

如何引用本页

ScholarGate. (2026, June 3). Multi-group Content Validity. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/zh/psychometrics/multi-group-content-validity

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

Compare side by side
ScholarGateMulti-group content validity (Multi-group Content Validity). 于 2026-06-15 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/psychometrics/multi-group-content-validity · 数据集: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026