方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| Social Identity Political Measurement× | 党派认同量表× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 政治心理学 | 政治心理学 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 2015 | 1960 |
| 提出者≠ | Leonie Huddy, Lilliana Mason & Lene Aaroe | Angus Campbell et al. |
| 类型≠ | Self-report identity scale | Self-report |
| 开创性文献≠ | Huddy, L., Mason, L., & Aaroe, L. (2015). Expressive partisanship: Campaign involvement, political emotion, and partisan identity. American Political Science Review, 109(1), 1-17. DOI ↗ | Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American voter. New York: John Wiley & Sons. link ↗ |
| 别名 | Political Social Identity Scale, Partisan Social Identity Measure, Expressive Partisanship Scale | PAS, Party Identification, Partisan Strength |
| 相关≠ | 4 | 3 |
| 摘要≠ | Social identity measurement in political behavior applies social identity theory (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) to political groups, treating partisanship, ideology, or movement membership as a social identity rather than a mere instrumental affiliation. Huddy, Mason and Aaroe (2015) adapted Mael and Tetlock-style identity items into a partisan social-identity scale that measures expressive, emotionally charged group attachment and predicts campaign activity and political emotion better than issue agreement. | The Partisan Identity Scale measures strength and direction of psychological attachment to a political party, encompassing both party preference and emotional party identification. Foundational since Campbell et al.'s American Voter (1960), the measure distinguishes party affiliation (which party one is registered with) from party identification (psychological identity with a party as a social group). Partisan identity is among the strongest predictors of voting behavior, political attitudes, and interpretation of political information, functioning as a 'perceptual filter' through which voters process news. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|