Inter-Indexer Consistency
Inter-indexer consistency measures how far two or more people agree when they independently assign subject terms to the same documents. Because subject indexing is a judgment task — choosing which descriptors best represent a document's content — different indexers routinely pick overlapping but not identical term sets, and the degree of that overlap is a fundamental indicator of the reliability of an indexing system. The standard quantity is the Hooper-style consistency coefficient, the size of the shared term set divided by the size of the combined term set, averaged across documents; Zunde and Dexter and later Rolling refined it and connected it to indexing quality. Low consistency signals that retrieval will be unpredictable, since whether a document is found can depend on which indexer happened to process it.
阅读完整方法
使用免费账户登录即可阅读本节。
方法图谱
相关方法的邻域——选择一个节点以展开探索。
来源
- Rolling, L. (1981). Indexing consistency, quality and efficiency. Information Processing & Management, 17(2), 69-76. DOI: 10.1016/0306-4573(81)90028-5 ↗
- Zunde, P., & Dexter, M. E. (1969). Indexing consistency and quality. American Documentation, 20(3), 259-267. DOI: 10.1002/asi.4630200313 ↗
- Manning, C. D., Raghavan, P., & Schütze, H. (2008). Introduction to Information Retrieval. Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9780521865715
如何引用本页
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Inter-Indexer Consistency (Agreement Between Indexers on Assigned Terms). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/zh/library-information-science/inter-indexer-consistency
选用哪种方法?
将本方法与其最相近的同类并置,并排研读——本馆将书籍铺陈于案上,取舍则由您定夺。
- Cranfield Evaluation ParadigmLibrary Information Science↔ 比较
- Indexing Consistency AnalysisLibrary Information Science↔ 比较
- TREC Pooling and Relevance JudgmentsLibrary Information Science↔ 比较