Query Expansion Evaluation
Query expansion evaluation measures whether adding terms to a user's query — drawn from a thesaurus, from corpus co-occurrence statistics, or from relevance or pseudo-relevance feedback — actually improves retrieval. Expansion attacks the vocabulary-mismatch problem, where relevant documents use words the searcher did not, and it tends to raise recall by bringing in synonymous and related terms. But it can also lower precision by introducing ambiguity, and it can help some queries while badly hurting others. Sound evaluation therefore reports not just the average effectiveness change but the recall-precision trade-off and a robustness analysis of how many individual queries were helped versus harmed.
阅读完整方法
使用免费账户登录即可阅读本节。
方法图谱
相关方法的邻域——选择一个节点以展开探索。
来源
- Manning, C. D., Raghavan, P., & Schütze, H. (2008). Introduction to Information Retrieval. Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9780521865715
- Salton, G., & Buckley, C. (1990). Improving retrieval performance by relevance feedback. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(4), 288-297. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199006)41:4<288::AID-ASI8>3.0.CO;2-H ↗
- Voorhees, E. M., & Harman, D. K. (Eds.). (2005). TREC: Experiment and Evaluation in Information Retrieval. MIT Press. ISBN: 9780262220736
如何引用本页
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Query Expansion Evaluation (Measuring the Effect of Term Addition on Retrieval). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/zh/library-information-science/query-expansion-evaluation
选用哪种方法?
将本方法与其最相近的同类并置,并排研读——本馆将书籍铺陈于案上,取舍则由您定夺。
- Cranfield Evaluation ParadigmLibrary Information Science↔ 比较
- Relevance Feedback EvaluationLibrary Information Science↔ 比较
- TREC Pooling and Relevance JudgmentsLibrary Information Science↔ 比较