Cranfield Evaluation Paradigm
The Cranfield evaluation paradigm is the foundational experimental design for measuring how well an information retrieval system finds relevant documents. Devised by Cyril Cleverdon at the College of Aeronautics in Cranfield during the 1960s, it fixes three ingredients — a document collection, a set of search requests, and human relevance judgments linking requests to documents — and then holds them constant so that competing indexing methods or retrieval algorithms can be compared on recall and precision under controlled, repeatable conditions. By abstracting evaluation away from any single live user and turning it into a reusable laboratory experiment, Cranfield made retrieval effectiveness a measurable quantity and supplied the template that every later large-scale campaign, including TREC, has built upon.
阅读完整方法
使用免费账户登录即可阅读本节。
方法图谱
相关方法的邻域——选择一个节点以展开探索。
来源
- Cleverdon, C. W. (1967). The Cranfield tests on index language devices. Aslib Proceedings, 19(6), 173-194. DOI: 10.1108/eb050097 ↗
- Voorhees, E. M., & Harman, D. K. (Eds.). (2005). TREC: Experiment and Evaluation in Information Retrieval. MIT Press. ISBN: 9780262220736
- Manning, C. D., Raghavan, P., & Schütze, H. (2008). Introduction to Information Retrieval. Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9780521865715
如何引用本页
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Cranfield Evaluation Paradigm (Test-Collection Evaluation of Retrieval Effectiveness). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/zh/library-information-science/cranfield-evaluation-paradigm
选用哪种方法?
将本方法与其最相近的同类并置,并排研读——本馆将书籍铺陈于案上,取舍则由您定夺。
- Query Expansion EvaluationLibrary Information Science↔ 比较
- Relevance Feedback EvaluationLibrary Information Science↔ 比较
- TREC Pooling and Relevance JudgmentsLibrary Information Science↔ 比较