方法证据记录
Meta-analytic competing risks analysis
Meta-analytic competing risks analysis pools results from multiple primary studies that each used a competing risks framework, allowing summary estimates of cause-specific or subdistribution hazard ratios and cumulative incidence functions. Because standard meta-analytic methods may misrepresent competing events, specialized pooling strategies are required that respect the subdistribution hazard structure introduced by Fine and Gray and the distinction between cause-specific and all-cause hazard models.
源记录
引文逐字复制自方法源记录。这些引文不代表任何层级的验证。
Meta-Analysis of Competing Risks Studies
分类方法记录 · process-pipeline / epidemiology
- Riley, R. D., Hayden, J. A., Steyerberg, E. W., et al. (2013). Prognosis Research Strategy (PROGRESS) 2: Prognostic Factor Research. PLOS Medicine, 10(2), e1001380. · DOI 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001380
- Wolkewitz, M., Cooper, B. S., Bonten, M. J., Barnett, A. G., & Schumacher, M. (2014). Interpreting and comparing risks in the presence of competing events. BMJ, 349, g5060. · DOI 10.1136/bmj.g5060
精选声明
声明已持久化到证据分类账中,每个声明都有自己的评估。
尚无精选声明
当分类账中没有声明时,此视图不会自行创建声明评估。
相关方法
从方法图中生成,显示为机器建议的关系 — 不推断任何证据声明。