ScholarGate
助手
Process / pipelineClinical / epidemiology

多中心诊断准确性研究

多中心诊断准确性研究旨在评估一项指标性检测(例如,生物标志物、影像学方法或临床预测规则)在两个或多个独立临床中心进行时,识别目标疾病的能力。通过招募来自不同环境的患者,该研究能够估算出比单中心研究更具外部有效性的敏感性、特异性以及似然比,并能明确评估检测性能在不同中心、患者群体和操作者技能水平之间的差异。

在 MethodMind 中打开即将推出视频即将推出Download slides

阅读完整方法

仅限会员

使用免费账户登录即可阅读本节。

登录

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

来源

  1. Bossuyt, P. M., Reitsma, J. B., Bruns, D. E., Gatsonis, C. A., Glasziou, P. P., Irwig, L., Lijmer, J. G., Moher, D., Rennie, D., de Vet, H. C. W., Kressel, H. Y., Rifai, N., Golub, R. M., Altman, D. G., Hooft, L., Korevaar, D. A., & Cohen, J. F. (2015). STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. BMJ, 351, h5527. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.h5527
  2. Rutjes, A. W. S., Reitsma, J. B., Coomarasamy, A., Khan, K. S., & Bossuyt, P. M. M. (2006). Evaluation of diagnostic tests when there is no gold standard: A review of methods. Health Technology Assessment, 10(50), iii–iv, 1–121. DOI: 10.3310/hta11500

如何引用本页

ScholarGate. (2026, June 3). Multicenter Diagnostic Accuracy Study. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/zh/epidemiology/multicenter-diagnostic-accuracy-study

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

Compare side by side
ScholarGateMulticenter Diagnostic Accuracy Study (Multicenter Diagnostic Accuracy Study). 于 2026-06-15 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/epidemiology/multicenter-diagnostic-accuracy-study · 数据集: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026