ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

窗口数据包络分析×Malmquist生产率指数×
领域效率分析效率分析
方法族Regression modelRegression model
起源年份19841994
提出者Charnes, Clark, Cooper & GolanyFäre, Grosskopf, Norris & Zhang
类型Non-parametric panel efficiency modelNon-parametric productivity index
开创性文献Charnes, A., Clark, C. T., Cooper, W. W., & Golany, B. (1984). A developmental study of data envelopment analysis in measuring the efficiency of maintenance units in the U.S. Air Forces. Annals of Operations Research, 2(1), 95–112. DOI ↗Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Norris, M., & Zhang, Z. (1994). Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries. American Economic Review, 84(1), 66–83. link ↗
别名Sliding-Window DEA, Temporal DEA, Rolling-Period DEA, Pencere VZAMPI, Malmquist Index, Malmquist DEA Productivity Index, Malmquist Verimlilik Endeksi
相关21
摘要Window Data Envelopment Analysis (Window DEA) is a non-parametric panel efficiency method that evaluates decision-making units (DMUs) over time by embedding each DMU's observations across a rolling temporal window into a single cross-sectional DEA problem. Introduced by Charnes, Clark, Cooper, and Golany in 1984, it enables longitudinal efficiency tracking without requiring a full panel, increasing discriminatory power by pooling observations across consecutive periods.The Malmquist Productivity Index (MPI) is a non-parametric measure of total factor productivity (TFP) change over time. Formally grounded in distance functions by Caves, Christensen, and Diewert (1982) and operationalized using Data Envelopment Analysis by Färe, Grosskopf, Norris, and Zhang (1994), MPI decomposes productivity growth into two components: efficiency change (catching-up to the frontier) and technical change (shift of the frontier itself).
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Window DEA · Malmquist Productivity Index. 于 2026-06-20 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare