ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

研究涉及弱势群体×研究中的知情同意豁免×
领域研究伦理研究伦理
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份19791991
提出者U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; World Health Organization; International research ethics communityU.S. Department of Health and Human Services; International research ethics guidelines
类型GuidelineGuideline
开创性文献U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2018). Protection of Human Subjects. Code of Federal Regulations Title 45, Part 46, Subparts B, C, D. link ↗U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2018). Protection of Human Subjects. Code of Federal Regulations Title 45, Part 46, Section 46.116(c). link ↗
别名vulnerable subjects, special populations, vulnerable groups, additional protectionsconsent waiver, waived consent, exempt from consent, research without consent
相关55
摘要Vulnerable populations are groups with limited capacity to protect themselves due to age, cognitive ability, institutional dependency, or social circumstances. Regulatory frameworks in the U.S. (45 CFR 46 Subparts B, C, D) and internationally identify specific vulnerable populations—children, prisoners, pregnant women, cognitively impaired individuals—and mandate additional ethical protections beyond standard informed consent. These protections include obtaining informed consent from surrogate decision-makers (parents, guardians), additional assurances of minimal risk, and enhanced monitoring for safety. Research ethics committees apply heightened scrutiny to studies involving vulnerable populations and may deny approval if special protections are inadequate.A waiver of informed consent permits research to proceed without obtaining prospective written or verbal consent from participants. This exception to the standard informed consent requirement applies to specific low-risk research scenarios where obtaining consent is impractical, unnecessary, or would compromise research validity. In the U.S., the regulations (45 CFR 46.116) specify four criteria that must be met for an IRB to approve a waiver; similar criteria apply in the UK (Research Ethics Committee) and EU jurisdictions. Waivers are not automatic; researchers must request them explicitly and justify them to the ethics committee, which determines whether the criteria are met.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 4 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 4 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Research with Vulnerable Populations · Waiver of Informed Consent in Research. 于 2026-06-20 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare