方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 时间序列交叉验证(滚动/扩展窗口)× | Diebold-Mariano Test× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 计量经济学 | 计量经济学 |
| 方法族≠ | Process / pipeline | Hypothesis test |
| 起源年份≠ | 2012 | 1995 |
| 提出者≠ | Christoph Bergmeir & José Benítez | Francis Diebold & Roberto Mariano |
| 类型≠ | Forecast evaluation procedure | Non-parametric forecast comparison test |
| 开创性文献≠ | Bergmeir, C., & Benítez, J. M. (2012). On the use of cross-validation for time series predictor evaluation. Information Sciences, 191, 192–213. DOI ↗ | Diebold, F. X., & Mariano, R. S. (1995). Comparing predictive accuracy. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 13(3), 253–263. DOI ↗ |
| 别名 | Rolling-Origin Cross-Validation, Walk-Forward Validation, Expanding Window Evaluation, Zaman Serisi Çapraz Doğrulama | DM Test, Test of Equal Forecast Accuracy, Diebold-Mariano Forecast Comparison Test, Tahmin Doğruluğu Eşitliği Testi |
| 相关 | 3 | 3 |
| 摘要≠ | Time-series cross-validation is a resampling procedure designed for sequentially ordered data. Instead of randomly partitioning observations — which would destroy temporal structure and introduce data leakage — it advances a forecast origin one step at a time, fitting a model on all past data up to that origin and evaluating it on the immediately following out-of-sample period. Economists, financial analysts, and meteorologists use it whenever an honest, operationally realistic estimate of predictive accuracy is required for a time-ordered process. | The Diebold-Mariano (DM) test, introduced by Diebold and Mariano in 1995, is a widely used non-parametric procedure for formally comparing the predictive accuracy of two competing forecasting models. It evaluates whether the difference in forecast errors between two models is statistically significant, without requiring nested models or specific distributional assumptions about the forecasts, making it broadly applicable across economics, finance, and time-series analysis. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|