ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

基于仿真的功效分析(蒙特卡洛功效)×t检验的功效分析×
领域统计学统计学
方法族Hypothesis testHypothesis test
起源年份20111969
提出者Arnold et al. (2011); Green & MacLeod (2016) for mixed-model extensionJacob Cohen
类型Simulation-based (Monte Carlo)Sample size determination
开创性文献Arnold, B.F. et al. (2011). Simulation Methods to Estimate Design Power: An Overview for Applied Research. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 11, 94. DOI ↗Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. ISBN: 978-0805802832
别名Monte Carlo power analysis, Monte Carlo simulation power, MC power, Simülasyon Tabanlı Güç Analizi (Monte Carlo Power)t-test power analysis, sample size calculation for t-test, Güç Analizi — t-Testi
相关65
摘要Simulation-based power analysis estimates the statistical power and required sample size of a study by repeating a full analysis pipeline thousands of times on artificially generated data. Because it relies on Monte Carlo simulation rather than closed-form equations, it is applicable to designs — mixed models, complex measurement structures, non-standard outcomes — where analytical power formulas do not exist. The approach was systematically described for applied research by Arnold et al. in 2011, and the mixed-model implementation via the SIMR package was formalised by Green and MacLeod in 2016.Power analysis for the t-test is a sample size planning procedure that determines how many participants are required to detect a mean difference of a given magnitude with acceptable probability. Formalised by Jacob Cohen in his 1969 and 1988 editions of Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, it links four quantities — effect size (Cohen's d), significance level (α), statistical power (1 − β), and sample size — so that fixing any three allows calculation of the fourth.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Simulation-Based Power Analysis · Power Analysis for t-test. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare