ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

稳健回归不连续设计×因果推断的工具变量(IV)方法×
领域因果推断卫生经济学
方法族Regression modelProcess / pipeline
起源年份20141990s (modern applications)
提出者Calonico, Cattaneo & TitiunikAngrist & Pischke (applied econometrics); rooted in econometric theory
类型Quasi-experimental causal inferenceMethod
开创性文献Calonico, S., Cattaneo, M. D., & Titiunik, R. (2014). Robust Nonparametric Confidence Intervals for Regression-Discontinuity Designs. Econometrica, 82(6), 2295-2326. DOI ↗Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. S. (2009). Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion. Princeton: Princeton University Press. link ↗
别名Robust RDD, Bias-corrected RDD, CCT estimator, rdrobustIV, two-stage least squares, TSLS, causal estimation
相关43
摘要Robust RDD extends the classical regression discontinuity design with bias correction and robust confidence intervals, addressing the under-coverage problem of conventional RDD inference. Developed by Calonico, Cattaneo, and Titiunik (2014), it uses local polynomial estimation with a bias-corrected point estimate and a wider variance term that accounts for the added uncertainty, yielding confidence intervals with correct asymptotic coverage.Instrumental variables (IV) is an econometric method to estimate causal effects when treatment or exposure is not randomly assigned and confounding is severe or unmeasured. IV relies on a third variable (instrument) that influences treatment but does not directly affect the outcome, allowing researchers to isolate the causal effect from the noise of confounding. Developed extensively in econometrics (Angrist & Pischke, 1990s–2000s), IV methods are increasingly used in health economics and health services research to leverage natural experiments and policy changes.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Robust Regression Discontinuity Design · Instrumental Variables in Health Research. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare