ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

稳健模型检验研究×贝叶斯模型检验研究×
领域研究设计研究设计
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1988–19981935 (Jeffreys); widely adopted in social and behavioral sciences from the 1990s onward
提出者Albert Satorra & Peter M. Bentler; Ke-Hai YuanHarold Jeffreys; formalized for applied sciences by Robert Kass and Adrian Raftery
类型Quantitative model-testing research design with robust estimationQuantitative inferential research design
开创性文献Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In A. von Eye & C. C. Clogg (Eds.), Latent variables analysis: Applications for developmental research (pp. 399–419). Sage. link ↗Kass, R. E., & Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayes factors. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90(430), 773–795. DOI ↗
别名robust SEM, robust structural model testing, robust fit evaluation, robust model evaluation researchBayesian hypothesis testing, Bayesian model comparison, Bayes factor analysis, BMT
相关64
摘要Robust model testing research applies structural or path models to data while explicitly accounting for violations of multivariate normality and other distributional assumptions. Rather than discarding non-normal data or forcing transformations, it uses corrected estimators — most notably the Satorra-Bentler scaled chi-square and Yuan-Bentler robust standard errors — to produce trustworthy fit indices and parameter estimates even when classical maximum likelihood assumptions are breached.Bayesian model testing research is a quantitative design in which competing theoretical models or hypotheses are evaluated by comparing their marginal likelihoods given observed data. The central tool is the Bayes factor — a ratio that quantifies how much more likely the data are under one model than under another. Unlike null-hypothesis significance testing, Bayesian model testing yields direct evidence for or against specific hypotheses, incorporates prior knowledge, and can support a null hypothesis rather than merely failing to reject it.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Robust Model Testing Research · Bayesian Model Testing Research. 于 2026-06-15 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare