方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 研究方案中的风险-效益评估× | 伦理委员会申请流程× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 研究伦理 | 研究伦理 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1979 | 1991 |
| 提出者≠ | U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; International research ethics community | U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; International research oversight organizations |
| 类型≠ | Framework | Guideline |
| 开创性文献≠ | The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1979). The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. link ↗ | U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2018). Protection of Human Subjects. Code of Federal Regulations Title 45, Part 46, Section 46.109. link ↗ |
| 别名 | risk-benefit analysis, risk-benefit calculation, risk-benefit justification, harm-benefit ratio | IRB application, REC application, ethics approval, protocol submission |
| 相关 | 5 | 5 |
| 摘要≠ | A risk-benefit assessment is a systematic evaluation of the potential harms and benefits of a proposed research study, documented in ethics committee applications. The Belmont Report (1979) established the principle of beneficence—maximizing benefits while minimizing harm—as a cornerstone of research ethics. Regulatory frameworks (45 CFR 46.111 in the U.S., equivalent in other jurisdictions) require ethics committees to determine that risks are reasonable in relation to anticipated benefits before approving research. This assessment is not a simple calculation (risks + benefits) but a qualitative judgment incorporating probability, magnitude, and distribution of harms and benefits. | Submitting a research protocol to an ethics committee (IRB, REC, or equivalent) is a mandatory procedural gateway in human subjects research. The application process requires researchers to document their study design, justify scientific rationale, disclose risks and benefits, provide participant protections (informed consent forms), and address ethical considerations. The submission includes a completed ethics application form, protocol document, consent forms, researcher CVs, and evidence of institutional support. This standardized process enables ethics committees to conduct rigorous, timely, and consistent review before research commences. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|