方法对比

	基于风险的响应面方法	响应面方法 (RSM)
领域	实验设计	实验设计
方法族	Process / pipeline	Hypothesis test
起源年份	1990s–2000s (risk-based extensions)	1951
提出者	Builds on Box & Wilson (1951) RSM; risk integration formalized in engineering reliability literature from the 1990s onward	George E. P. Box & K. B. Wilson
类型	Experimental optimization with probabilistic risk constraints	Second-order polynomial response surface model
开创性文献	Myers, R. H., Montgomery, D. C., & Anderson-Cook, C. M. (2009). Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments (3rd ed.). Wiley. ISBN: 978-0470174463	Box, G. E. P. & Wilson, K. B. (1951). On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 13(1), 1–45.
别名	Risk-based RSM, reliability-based RSM, probabilistic RSM, risk-integrated response surface methodology	RSM, Central Composite Design, Box-Behnken Design, CCD
相关	5	7
摘要	Risk-based Response Surface Methodology (Risk-based RSM) extends classical RSM by embedding probabilistic risk or reliability constraints into the experimental optimization process. Rather than seeking a single optimal point under deterministic conditions, it identifies factor settings that achieve performance goals while keeping the probability of failure or unacceptable outcomes below a specified threshold — making it especially valuable in safety-critical and high-variability engineering contexts.	Response Surface Methodology is a collection of statistical and mathematical techniques for building an empirical second-order polynomial model that relates a continuous response variable to two or more controllable input factors, and then locating the factor settings that optimize that response. The approach was introduced by George E. P. Box and K. B. Wilson in their landmark 1951 paper and has since become a cornerstone of process optimization across engineering, chemistry, food science, and pharmaceutics.