ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

定性研究中的反思性×可信度标准在定性研究中的应用×
领域质性研究质性研究
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份19901985
提出者Anthony Giddens and Pierre BourdieuYvonna Lincoln and Egon Guba
类型ConceptFramework
开创性文献Finlay, L. (2002). Outing the researcher: The provenance, process, and practice of reflexivity. Qualitative Health Research, 12(4), 531-545. DOI ↗Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-0803924314
别名reflexive practice, researcher reflexivity, positionality, reflective practicetrustworthiness criteria, credibility, dependability, confirmability
相关44
摘要Reflexivity is the practice of examining how the researcher's identity, assumptions, relationships, and values influence the research process and findings. Rather than treating objectivity as achievable detachment, reflexivity acknowledges that the researcher is embedded within the research and cannot be fully separated from it. Originating in sociology and anthropology, reflexivity has become central to qualitative research rigor across disciplines. Reflexive researchers critically examine their own influence at each stage: research design, participant recruitment, data collection, interpretation, and presentation. This transparency strengthens rigor by making visible the lens through which data are collected and interpreted.Trustworthiness is a framework for evaluating the quality and rigor of qualitative research, developed by Lincoln and Guba (1985) as an alternative to quantitative criteria (internal validity, external validity, reliability, objectivity). The framework comprises five criteria: credibility (findings are accurate and grounded in data), transferability (findings apply to other contexts), dependability (findings are consistent and defensible), confirmability (findings reflect the data and participants' perspectives, not researcher bias), and authenticity (research reflects diverse viewpoints and promotes understanding). This framework has become standard for assessing qualitative research across disciplines and guides researchers in designing and reporting rigorous qualitative studies.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 4 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 4 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Reflexivity in Qualitative Research · Trustworthiness Criteria in Qualitative Research. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare