ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

定性证据综合方法×文献分析×
领域质性研究质性研究
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份19881920
提出者George Noblit and Dwight HareMax Weber and Karl Mannheim
类型MethodMethod
开创性文献Noblit, G. W., & Hare, R. D. (1988). Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing Qualitative Studies. SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-0803931725Scott, J. (1990). A Matter of Record: Documentary Sources in Social Research. Polity Press. ISBN: 978-0745608419
别名qualitative meta-synthesis, meta-ethnography, thematic synthesis, systematic review of qualitative studiesdocumentary analysis, textual analysis, content analysis of documents, archival research
相关44
摘要Qualitative evidence synthesis (QES) is a systematic method for combining and interpreting findings from multiple qualitative research studies to generate higher-level understanding and theory. Different approaches—meta-ethnography, thematic synthesis, meta-narrative review, critical interpretive synthesis—each have distinct philosophical underpinnings and analytical procedures. Introduced by Noblit and Hare (1988) with meta-ethnography, qualitative synthesis has evolved alongside systematic reviews of quantitative research. Unlike quantitative meta-analysis, which pools numerical effect sizes, qualitative synthesis integrates concepts, themes, and interpretations from primary studies, identifying patterns, conflicts, and emergent theory. QES is increasingly used in health research, social sciences, and education to understand complex phenomena, translate research into practice, and identify gaps in evidence.Document analysis is a systematic qualitative research method for examining written, visual, or audiovisual sources—such as policy documents, historical records, organizational records, media reports, emails, social media posts, photographs, or videos—to extract meaning, identify patterns, and understand social phenomena. Developed by Weber and Mannheim in early 20th-century sociology, the method bridges historical research, content analysis, and textual interpretation. Document analysis is used across disciplines to understand organizational change, policy evolution, media representation, historical events, and cultural meaning. Documents provide evidence of what organizations, institutions, or societies value, decide, and communicate, often revealing contradictions between policy and practice.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 4 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 4 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Qualitative Evidence Synthesis Methods · Document Analysis. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare