ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

可信度标准在定性研究中的应用×定性研究中的反思性×
领域质性研究质性研究
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份19851990
提出者Yvonna Lincoln and Egon GubaAnthony Giddens and Pierre Bourdieu
类型FrameworkConcept
开创性文献Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-0803924314Finlay, L. (2002). Outing the researcher: The provenance, process, and practice of reflexivity. Qualitative Health Research, 12(4), 531-545. DOI ↗
别名trustworthiness criteria, credibility, dependability, confirmabilityreflexive practice, researcher reflexivity, positionality, reflective practice
相关44
摘要Trustworthiness is a framework for evaluating the quality and rigor of qualitative research, developed by Lincoln and Guba (1985) as an alternative to quantitative criteria (internal validity, external validity, reliability, objectivity). The framework comprises five criteria: credibility (findings are accurate and grounded in data), transferability (findings apply to other contexts), dependability (findings are consistent and defensible), confirmability (findings reflect the data and participants' perspectives, not researcher bias), and authenticity (research reflects diverse viewpoints and promotes understanding). This framework has become standard for assessing qualitative research across disciplines and guides researchers in designing and reporting rigorous qualitative studies.Reflexivity is the practice of examining how the researcher's identity, assumptions, relationships, and values influence the research process and findings. Rather than treating objectivity as achievable detachment, reflexivity acknowledges that the researcher is embedded within the research and cannot be fully separated from it. Originating in sociology and anthropology, reflexivity has become central to qualitative research rigor across disciplines. Reflexive researchers critically examine their own influence at each stage: research design, participant recruitment, data collection, interpretation, and presentation. This transparency strengthens rigor by making visible the lens through which data are collected and interpreted.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 4 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 4 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Trustworthiness Criteria in Qualitative Research · Reflexivity in Qualitative Research. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare