ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

多分类测量不变性×多组验证性因子分析 (MG-CFA)×
领域心理测量学心理测量学
方法族Latent structureLatent structure
起源年份2000–20041971
提出者Roger E. Millsap, Robert J. VandenbergKarl Jöreskog
类型Multi-group confirmatory testMeasurement model / invariance test
开创性文献Millsap, R. E. & Kwok, O.-M. (2004). Evaluating the impact of partial factor loading and intercept invariance on selection utility. Psychological Methods, 9(2), 200–215. link ↗Vandenberg, R. J. & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. DOI ↗
别名PMI, ordinal measurement invariance, polytomous factorial invariance, polytomous multi-group measurement invarianceMG-CFA, multi-group CFA, measurement invariance testing, multi-sample CFA
相关56
摘要Polytomous measurement invariance testing evaluates whether a scale with ordered categorical (polytomous) response options — such as Likert-type items — measures the same latent construct in the same way across two or more groups. It extends classical multi-group CFA invariance testing to properly account for the ordinal nature of item responses, ensuring that group comparisons of latent means or factor structures are substantively valid.Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis tests whether a measurement model holds equivalently across two or more groups — such as cultures, genders, or time points. By imposing increasingly stringent equality constraints and comparing model fit, it determines whether comparisons of latent mean scores are justified.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Polytomous Measurement Invariance · Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare